RE: Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 08 December 2017 15:51 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02ED0126B6D; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 07:51:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OSx2K6ojnAJP; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 07:51:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot0-x241.google.com (mail-ot0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88EB71200B9; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 07:51:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot0-x241.google.com with SMTP id q3so9498264oth.2; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 07:51:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=17MEenKkKpzZk1x89eBCRZ3UXELunq+rwjmiyP3zx5Q=; b=VJa0u6gZ9lS1arjA3q8ogA+7k0HssdUs1qPiG9EDqCB9/EDEbQWj+fqcPQa/KTZR5e b+DByytqzmXSEfS/9hUkaPmq7eLUSzvVYJlJw2I1MGziwsPcSibOGWooVKRKdko95ljf uGhIdx/JJKxpJR2jzH48FvkZ8/ZZZ4WcsPX+k20mkq5kZv12/PS+z8NUmOSRJchfz+0x l2DUrPIXZFh/BSGR9Dkgzb9ZNRF0zxwGgzBeynemMaOdWqcJiC8pq3454snM/vcIMR8b Vn5+jz9yi3zf3rO+2F2/v2YeISwKUHU2lLkLU5h6CN4jUw4Pu8A0U0tMhdLtF150I7hG fSQQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=17MEenKkKpzZk1x89eBCRZ3UXELunq+rwjmiyP3zx5Q=; b=kyeUK34BOTuenQbUM5/hgBAVpkjGdXPTWTo4z2CDhZW7vmvHXfxaeV/kl1Gmbvx2y0 iM1tw/3W54tdLIbM8j57wB+dwlfHo6a9IX/kK2ThZcc/MVRzF/+mdIpmDvJ3tyLFx2S5 Y+q6By2b7tCkBnCweivH0v8g1l0GDL0EdJwqM+m/gyLdZYOIS16XdF+570u52umiz95C OeUTIvCwGw7rEnHD9S3C+rEiYwht+IFyCUlW6zF7c3TYyCWav6xqpEc0AMUtx7Bpsdrz xp7o09drhaL6mxhgpeeTp4SWl1GVs+G/jA8qnoG7af4cu9VOC7Eu+9ZMoCro/8GjBQaM KS9Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX4VrHgh9V9LAxHJS5ATPITKiSwiB4g4m1iTMJw0HI5nyM77eH/A mg7iBjM2VIWkGwFh3pyk3kvDkZNnMK7kL+MLBqU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMa+bvm92vMrA16PGzyPt+grL6EXockHU4MV7rzAvpuIZTaX9frca4RbRbbhO0hlCDijZ4KEpIRPLeHo7kN2H2o=
X-Received: by 10.157.56.200 with SMTP id k8mr26705340ote.3.1512748299962; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 07:51:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 09:51:39 -0600
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <16596_1510537651_5A08F9B3_16596_339_1_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF921EABBB87@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <150766865027.13436.4602054386632294983.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <12174_1507712861_59DDDF5D_12174_52_1_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF921EA865C2@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CAMMESsxEFugQRJx4PG9GupPPvg-eZzz99r-e9EOxHPzEU_n51w@mail.gmail.com> <26205_1507790863_59DF100F_26205_313_1_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF921EA86D8A@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CAMMESszwJqP3j6G+BBwkQLL=o33gLhR+8XH7s_M=DzBX5o_g0Q@mail.gmail.com> <24816_1507822548_59DF8BD4_24816_233_1_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF921EA87342@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <16596_1510537651_5A08F9B3_16596_339_1_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF921EABBB87@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
X-Mailer: Airmail (461)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 09:51:39 -0600
Message-ID: <CAMMESsxypnv5JOksmC+XhFHEgpnhC_by5mu0=PfJ0976KFWaUA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: RE: Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
To: stephane.litkowski@orange.com
Cc: "Acee Lindem (acee) (acee@cisco.com)" <acee@cisco.com>, "chrisbowers.ietf@gmail.com" <chrisbowers.ietf@gmail.com>, "rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org" <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c01f180dce41055fd6296b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/aZYFo8IlvdYn6q0agd8fUNhj9Ik>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 15:51:42 -0000

Stephane:

Hi!

The definition below feels a little forced, but it’s ok.

I’m clearing the DISCUSS.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

On November 12, 2017 at 8:47:31 PM, stephane.litkowski@orange.com (
stephane.litkowski@orange.com) wrote:

I just posted a v9 which fixes the definition of LSP_GEN_TIMER as follows:

LSP_GEN_TIMER: The delay between two consecutives local LSP/LSA

      generation.  From an operational point of view, this delay is

      usually tuned to batch multiple local events in one single local

      LSP/LSA update.  In IS-IS, this timer is defined as

      minimumLSPGenerationInterval in [ISO10589].  In OSPF version 2,

      this timer is defined as MinLSInterval in [RFC2328].  It is often

      associated with a vendor specific damping mechanism to slow down

      reactions by incrementing the timer when multiple consecutive

      events are detected.



I hope it addresses your comment, otherwise let me know.