IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Request for WG adoption of draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa

Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 24 May 2017 08:18 UTC

Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB2B12706D for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 May 2017 01:18:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G8GCxqTQCLVm for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 May 2017 01:18:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x241.google.com (mail-wm0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2916D1201FA for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 May 2017 01:18:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x241.google.com with SMTP id k15so44156095wmh.3 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 May 2017 01:18:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Eo7Gnkn4qLzijQbP9xPNzn3MoF7sHhFv1aJIrbGT8hA=; b=Lf6pyUByYjKoiTUNPGWC6Y6PSEx3pWTLfrHxOObthabpy6YVv+BMIltT2Kk+zLXYXN B2ihkSNolfgFe0Dfu74UAtLeduNpzfQJPhVLkgMm52dyah01LIqlpfOX0ERrQ4jofjPF YE8PznLhbBRVZ+cGkQgrfTRmZMrQyP+k5bw5cJHYrolphxOK0yJSKtArPIpiYp1E6a1u XGLmTtcN9miCKSW9a1NmnTvyLsIChpRz5Oa12bR6iHR8EDrcIRcnh0U3Xy/AFNgoC70V v0/dfr4O3KAk2swIF7EVPMStT+tCgzUQO55rLOePAtxxQrQczkkGKBkzDpaEw3NTh7YI 7zPw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id :thread-topic:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Eo7Gnkn4qLzijQbP9xPNzn3MoF7sHhFv1aJIrbGT8hA=; b=URgQPjFnep4Gx9uif32Dll2DCZpqBs5XvjGyxt44ZZrEjMIw+Z86EkuI1O6Jn2KTfF cKJvkMsYNBDyP3XgGoycqjoiUIT5TWRPkOMWcI6cDgkKIYLQYyDepMONts18FCaWaJ83 gZEYX/cHTXA0uirZ0Qvm7P+6y2fw6xh0F89CBJxx2cP1Zg24c1oXspE+4QZ7VDoT7TrY PMHqFYFC2rowfmyq3miwfE0hkR61490lKEzmfruNEWOhYHE1pQxzPoithgTwWblH52MA xjQfHLOfmWkEwh7xRkyhE9tpuReWNf27hIoj3eblkIrOJawMxU2yLKQt4cT0PxcR8Z1f DPKQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcAALK+WYPknHh6+fbrxiOPY745IMtH/XVARXLQdTh0dTXaSq1pZ eoMQ9IXoOBlmUQ==
X-Received: by 10.28.31.136 with SMTP id f130mr4770616wmf.117.1495613894750; Wed, 24 May 2017 01:18:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.28.4.31] ([195.238.226.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 1sm5324709wrw.32.2017.05.24.01.18.13 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 24 May 2017 01:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.21.0.170409
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 01:18:12 -0700
Subject: Re: Request for WG adoption of draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "Ahmed Bashandy (bashandy)" <bashandy@cisco.com>, chrisbowers.ietf@gmail.com
CC: "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>, LITKOWSKI Stephane SCE/IBNF <stephane.litkowski@orange.com>, DECRAENE Bruno IMT/OLN <bruno.decraene@orange.com>, "pfrpfr@gmail.com" <pfrpfr@gmail.com>, "Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil)" <cfilsfil@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <1B822DAB-9680-4E8F-AC07-06196D1853A5@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: Request for WG adoption of draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa
References: <59162450.7020508@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <59162450.7020508@cisco.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/cuKtexlQ7VSKbJfAsoH1umaM9rw>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 08:18:18 -0000

Hi Ahmed,

I’ll start the process, you will see early review comments coming your way.
There should be at least 3 implementations of TI-LFA (to my knowledge), would you please gather this data and if possible implementation report and include it in the draft?

Thanks!
 
Cheers,
Jeff
 

On 5/12/17, 14:08, "Ahmed Bashandy (bashandy)" <bashandy@cisco.com> wrote:

    Hi
    
    We would like to request the WG adoption of 
    draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa-00. The draft replaces 
    draft-francois-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa-04
    
    The draft was presented in IETF-96 in Berlin last summer
    
    Thanks
    
    Ahmed

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email