IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: WG adoption poll for draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model-07

"Aseem Choudhary (asechoud)" <asechoud@cisco.com> Mon, 03 December 2018 04:42 UTC

Return-Path: <asechoud@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F163D1277C8; Sun, 2 Dec 2018 20:42:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.959
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.959 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-1.459, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M4jSknhPCB1I; Sun, 2 Dec 2018 20:42:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4E00127333; Sun, 2 Dec 2018 20:42:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=13848; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1543812128; x=1545021728; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=3WCpsS+AIvF151t+SlibLGv/1Lc8YVD0edAD93nDa98=; b=AuMQXKj3aJwwN+mlUTrxzWlue2DCG/KIH5j8Gswx5H01/+Lv/Q/TQ41b xxjZjOXeQi6qXpycXIxXEXcLuQBPENNj2Aa4HyIoPNn/Yr23P1wysQ+Bh Gs6uzgsGzZIaxMK6RFl4fhtyi9K6JhVxpoZSXhhdSd0tdghoVtfh6xsQZ U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ADAACpswRc/5BdJa1jGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBUQQBAQEBAQsBgQ12ZoECJwqDb4gYjAmBaCV8iBWIYYVWFIFmCwEBGAEKhEkCF4MdIjQJDQEDAQECAQECbRwMhTwBAQEEAQEhCkEGBRACAQgRAwECKAMCAgIfBgsUCQgCBAENBYMhAYEdTAMVD6QKgS+FQII2DYIXBYwcF4FAP4ERJwwTghc1gldHAQGBKQUBEgE/FoJOMYImAo8WhkiKNC4JAo4Mgy4YgVuFEYo6iQSFcIlSAhEUgScfOGRxcBUaISoBgkGLHIU/QTGLNYEfgR8BAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,309,1539648000"; d="scan'208,217";a="490569015"
Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Dec 2018 04:42:07 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (xch-rcd-001.cisco.com [173.37.102.11]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id wB34g7a0006580 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 3 Dec 2018 04:42:07 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-004.cisco.com (173.37.102.14) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Sun, 2 Dec 2018 22:42:07 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-004.cisco.com ([173.37.102.14]) by XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com ([173.37.102.14]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Sun, 2 Dec 2018 22:42:07 -0600
From: "Aseem Choudhary (asechoud)" <asechoud@cisco.com>
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>, Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: WG adoption poll for draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model-07
Thread-Topic: WG adoption poll for draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model-07
Thread-Index: AQHUiR3zYfIvVYtpQkeiGnTNjLVi0aVqes6AgAHWhAA=
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 04:42:07 +0000
Message-ID: <9C8B06FC-2891-4346-8E10-69B5D1A8CF0B@cisco.com>
References: <5e6b8c2a-bbc0-4390-b8d8-358477757cf6@Spark> <CA+RyBmU=hckXjH+E8XCT2E+Z0aw7a69Y1hTreA84Ch+ewmWrkQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmU=hckXjH+E8XCT2E+Z0aw7a69Y1hTreA84Ch+ewmWrkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.3.181015
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.13.76]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9C8B06FC289143468E1069B5D1A8CF0Bciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.11, xch-rcd-001.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-8.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/dH9oQqMCuHeE89ZNnhkXIVH1LY8>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 04:42:11 -0000

Hi Greg,

Thanks for your question.

This draft defines the QoS base modules of Policy, Classiier, Action, Target. QoS base module has been augmented with Diffserv module.
This is described in Section 1.
For MPLS, similar modules will be augmented as part of separate draft. This has not been specifically mentioned but can be added.

Regards,
Aseem

From: rtgwg <rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 8:38 AM
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: WG adoption poll for draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model-07

Dear Authors,
thank you for taking on this work. I have a question rather philosophical than technical. The title of the draft suggests that the models are generic though they are based on DSCP field of the IP header. Have you considered extending models to include the Traffic Class field of MPLS Label element? And if not, then clarify that the models are for networks with IP data plane?

Regards,
Greg

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 6:31 PM Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>> wrote:
Dear RTGWG,

The authors have requested RTGWG to adopt draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model as the working group document.
The draft has received support during IETF101 meeting, authors have addressed all the comments received.

Please indicate support or no-support by December 15, 2018.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this
email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.
The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will not
advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each
author and each individual that has contributed to the document..

Cheers,
Jeff & Chris
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
rtgwg@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email