IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps

"duzongpeng@foxmail.com" <duzongpeng@foxmail.com> Fri, 08 April 2022 01:12 UTC

Return-Path: <duzongpeng@foxmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2143A0840; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 18:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.84
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.84 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=1.951, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=foxmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YiqTO6bc4S3z; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 18:12:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out203-205-221-205.mail.qq.com (out203-205-221-205.mail.qq.com [203.205.221.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D6FC3A0814; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 18:12:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=foxmail.com; s=s201512; t=1649380316; bh=lLpbsLVnmTyloRUAYLK7XiUhwa8wqJylCHDKoQaLTZk=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References; b=kJV07sRlGPCJ4WR4x6zjlb5Q4cLujv2e8NOK4m5WqHY02BijBkIvI1fUVS6b6/4yI F0oi5MY+u0L8YZqLDuRtWp8jIVtpGfn4kMJZgEVr/eXKI7vyjE6ikS4AFTBU0BHWsC iuQWHDTzScLSpjhDV5/wwHFRl6hrjtX2t9mU4PEo=
Received: from cmcc-PC ([103.35.105.43]) by newxmesmtplogicsvrsza5.qq.com (NewEsmtp) with SMTP id 2F59EE13; Fri, 08 Apr 2022 09:11:53 +0800
X-QQ-mid: xmsmtpt1649380313tbi0nm7ac
Message-ID: <tencent_DEAD572D29CAACFC0BCACD87859D852FAA05@qq.com>
X-QQ-XMAILINFO: MmSh5SXF8NZI7cVtjOw1RHshFZbz4cWzvUWiyfbyN6dbjX/TBQ1eqg1PVvcwSn mjG/sXX86asfPiwX7ZG8QBmsmS2cJRMRY0fGWMA3q3PoqToS1JrWQP+sCkwwYKjzeCnzvL9SODCD V5xHZht0Vfqf0cik85Ga/PajKAcon4TEvZb0+PG9W+4pEkIj61BcWUdX5sqCAM/FX0ONd/gtYvLi 2pGKCcQ5BpJU1MkbmUae/iZCkVOKyoq9Kr8Tg1SZx4u97qZ9hmcWVuIxrQdqNz5F+MXBCrUUSElg vlsJkjEXM/TSqkdmP3XtNqeuvoU0W2yh84faqnrlqwZpDKI6gjDlp7Ui/tPzEpmV2W3gaT9LvqC9 3B9TkxRITC6WXCuOiZXqg5fCVz2rj9zJSqUIxlWMKlHs3kiaAla5Dzs0FeJZ+dRTsxiv2EimNiVd QbgnR5zQQZGTNMWihfc6p+6jQSDTIAOjtkIdRPBH1GbZcXET6Gz9qUz6sad5tQyqe1/05gWmpnhv I0s/Sq7DrF7GzqCsJI2g38H07CqVE6QEkQKAafpdqUuE5kfli1i7TrkYd/J31IdXhIcgUpmSFWYa KlaKaG1gcnmW/WcULYXRwDqNeRY5QdF6FPt2drwgcXP4KvbQroxXHQTB/UXEIPjO3s6JznrJuotP XguBkjDyz67LQ85CmHJcraPYvOeCHqeMNBdiqc6IDZYKY5nFhZOU4tDfYATv0W6njcsCLQh4nOJ8 rO2NSj2yz1Hi6IKPhVLlFwB34BkF2JxKDOqNCk3/s3YFiYIEyVqB4HR2lXcQVbmV+iyYJjuGP7LF MIveHMGJgxgIXuKot2kBgk5o+tVgv4B/WZsq1kgrM38xx2BSf3g/QLBReoivOhtSXkJC+rj5Zeo2 drWz7KnCkxUK+T1befbfzNPRZ4ZyxO0jPsy1pLHRJSKyeUdcxNz04=
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 09:11:59 +0800
From: "duzongpeng@foxmail.com" <duzongpeng@foxmail.com>
To: "Jeff Tantsura" <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>, rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, "rtg-ads@ietf.org" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps
References: <204D8DE6-F51C-4551-B1D7-1D69DBCA3626@hxcore.ol>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.23.121[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-OQ-MSGID: <202204080911588022673@foxmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart374224811242_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/eTgyqW8_fGsmSYT0Z5Vblwy1S3A>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2022 01:12:08 -0000

Hi, all

    I am interested in the focus WG. APN is some extension in the IP layer, and can provide more information to the network.

    
Best Regards
Zongpeng Du 



duzongpeng@foxmail.com & duzongpeng@chinamobile.com
 
From: Jeff Tantsura
Date: 2022-04-06 01:14
To: RTGWG; rtgwg-chairs; rtg-ads@ietf.org
Subject: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps
Dear RTGWG,
 
 
APN has been presented at RTGWG multiple times, and we see the evolution of the
documents, including the scope of the problem and framework.  This topic needs
collaboration across WGs; we can foresee that not all issues to be addressed are
within the charter of RTGWG and would span beyond the Routing area.
 
RTGWG is chartered to provide a venue for new work, there are a couple of different options and one option for handling
such new work would be to recommend the development of a new WG.  
The Chairs would then want to recommend that the ADs consider forming a focus WG, with a set of well defined deliverables and milestones (after delivery the group would be shut down) to work on a framework for APN.
 
We would like to solicit the WG for opinions.  Please note that comments about
existing APN documents should be sent to apn@ietf.org.  This thread focuses on
support or objection to recommending that the ADs consider the formation of a
new WG.
 
Please send your comments, support, or objectiond.
Thanks!
 
 
Cheers,
Yingzhen  Jeff

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email