soliciting feedback to Networking problems that enterprises face to interconnect Workloads in Hybrid Cloud DCs.

Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com> Wed, 07 March 2018 05:36 UTC

Return-Path: <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01F2F126C25 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Mar 2018 21:36:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.23
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.23 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4kKxXdq9BQci for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Mar 2018 21:36:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 106D0124BE8 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Mar 2018 21:36:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 1591E93AAB8BE for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Mar 2018 05:36:29 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SJCEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.208.112.39) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.382.0; Wed, 7 Mar 2018 05:36:30 +0000
Received: from SJCEML521-MBB.china.huawei.com ([169.254.6.91]) by SJCEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.179]) with mapi id 14.03.0382.000; Tue, 6 Mar 2018 21:36:23 -0800
From: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
To: 'Jeff Tantsura' <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>, "chrisbowers.ietf@gmail.com" <chrisbowers.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: Andrew Malis <Andrew.Malis@huawei.com>, "christian.jacquenet@orange.com" <christian.jacquenet@orange.com>, "Mehmet Toy (mehmet.toy@verizon.com)" <mehmet.toy@verizon.com>, "akatlas@gmail.com" <akatlas@gmail.com>
Subject: soliciting feedback to Networking problems that enterprises face to interconnect Workloads in Hybrid Cloud DCs.
Thread-Topic: soliciting feedback to Networking problems that enterprises face to interconnect Workloads in Hybrid Cloud DCs.
Thread-Index: AdO11jc9v1pv+jpJTs+Mxw4TBuQdkg==
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 05:36:22 +0000
Message-ID: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B015658@SJCEML521-MBB.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.132.78]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/enj0Wv2bMuZ7AdX4MMrpseF_Eh8>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2018 05:36:35 -0000

Jeff and Chris, 

Can we have 10 minutes slot in the IETF 101 RTGwg session to discuss some of the (network) problems that many enterprises face when they have workloads & applications & data split among hybrid data centers, especially for those enterprises with multiple sites that are already interconnected by VPNs (e.g. MPLS L2VPN/L3VPN) and leased lines?  
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement/

The goals of the discussion is to
-  bring some awareness to the problems space
-  see whether there is a need or interests for enhancements to existing protocols or whether a new protocol is necessary to solve them

The draft also describes common approaches deployed by enterprises for interconnection of workloads & applications hosted in Cloud DCs with on-premises DCs & branch offices. 

Thanks,  Linda Dunbar


-----Original Message-----
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] 
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2018 1:05 PM
To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>;; Christian Jacquenet <christian.jacquenet@orange.com>;; Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>;; Andrew Malis <agmalis@gmail.com>;; Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@gmail.com>;; Mehmet Toy <mehmet.toy@verizon.com>;
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement-01.txt


A new version of I-D, draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement-01.txt
has been successfully submitted by Linda Dunbar and posted to the IETF repository.

Name:		draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement
Revision:	01
Title:		Seamless Interconnect Underlay to Cloud Overlay Problem Statement
Document date:	2018-03-05
Group:		Individual Submission
Pages:		18
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement-01.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement-01
Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement-01
Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement-01

Abstract:
   This document describes common approaches deployed by enterprises
   for interconnection of workloads & applications hosted in Cloud DCs
   with on-premises DCs & branch offices. This document also describes
   some of the (network) problems that many enterprises face when they
   have workloads & applications & data split among hybrid data
   centers, especially for those enterprises with multiple sites that
   are already interconnected by VPNs (e.g. MPLS L2VPN/L3VPN) and
   leased lines.

   Current operational problems in the field are examined to determine
   whether there is a need for enhancements to existing protocols or
   whether a new protocol is necessary to solve them.

                                                                                  


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat