Re: Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-lne-model-05: (with COMMENT)

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Wed, 07 February 2018 00:52 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1419612E883; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 16:52:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.53
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.53 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KOJYeZKfXmEt; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 16:52:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2946B126DFB; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 16:52:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2152; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1517964761; x=1519174361; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=G0AN8aHsX7blExeD/jkjYAw+q6QhNUOIU4MVXioyAy0=; b=DQuXlwgXfbdgGFXFeS86gr4ax2k46EEDBv1YeGQO0otecxpKDmHwMXz2 ydEM3xIasuiL3YoUetUXdtc7Stm9ezhgkHupoSKUWJvcBMJzu8/s0poP5 6yyrrzJ3Xi9kBzXIe0e/7ndujoTWL3RRlQ8+wkio6lGjcurFNyqx+HgsE c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0C6AAA1TXpa/49dJa1cGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQcBAQEBAYNRZnAoCoNbiiSOMYsVjjUVggMKGAuFGAIagkJUGAEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAmsohSQCBAEBIRE6CxACAQgODAImAgICHwYLFRACBAENBYodAxUQs2iCJ4c6D?= =?us-ascii?q?YExggoBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEYBYEPg1uCFYNogwWCa0QBAQEBAQG?= =?us-ascii?q?BOgESAR+DFzGCNAWKaZkHPgKIGIhThQeCHoYni3eNcUiJGgIRGQGBOwEfOWBXE?= =?us-ascii?q?QhwFT0qAYIbgwqBbXgBi0qBJYEXAQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,471,1511827200"; d="scan'208";a="67294357"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Feb 2018 00:52:40 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (xch-rtp-012.cisco.com [64.101.220.152]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w170qeGq020090 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 7 Feb 2018 00:52:40 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (64.101.220.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 19:52:39 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 19:52:39 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>, "rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org" <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-rtgwg-lne-model@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-lne-model@ietf.org>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-lne-model-05: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Topic: Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-lne-model-05: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHTn25wS7lkt1EYEka/xwq6SZxRiKOYHQQA
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 00:52:39 +0000
Message-ID: <43E85496-37BB-48C7-A617-BCD343AAA21C@cisco.com>
References: <151793746860.28182.11937072048180469773.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <151793746860.28182.11937072048180469773.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.195]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <35F3103AD48EB64A83BAF92B014FC1D7@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/ezfx6j34QVGYpsleOL2wAOoVhu8>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 00:52:43 -0000

Hi Alvaro, 

´╗┐On 2/6/18, 12:18 PM, "rtgwg on behalf of Alvaro Retana" <rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of aretana.ietf@gmail.com>; wrote:

    Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for
    draft-ietf-rtgwg-lne-model-05: No Objection
    
    When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
    email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
    introductory paragraph, however.)
    
    
    Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
    for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
    
    
    The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-lne-model/
    
    
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    COMMENT:
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    This document references/augments rfc7223.  It should reference rfc7223bis
    instead.  The examples in Appendix B still show the interfaces-state subtree,
    but the main text doesn't.  Are there any other changes in rfc7223bis that
    would impact this document?

I've fixed all the references to RFC7223 and RFC8022. I've also collapsed all the examples and tree diagrams to single routing and interface trees. 

Thanks,
Acee 

    
    
    _______________________________________________
    rtgwg mailing list
    rtgwg@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg