Comments on draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture-07
János Farkas <janos.farkas@ericsson.com> Thu, 10 December 2015 16:23 UTC
Return-Path: <Janos.Farkas@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA88F1A8AA9 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 08:23:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qdia06zvETFJ for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 08:23:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sesbmg23.ericsson.net (sesbmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 270CA1A890B for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 08:23:07 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-f79876d0000011ee-56-5669a6ea2201
Received: from ESESSHC016.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.66]) by sesbmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 48.07.04590.AE6A9665; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 17:23:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [159.107.143.212] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.68) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.248.2; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 17:23:06 +0100
Message-ID: <5669A6E9.8060401@ericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 17:23:05 +0100
From: János Farkas <janos.farkas@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Comments on draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture-07
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrOLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2K7k+6rZZlhBr+bJC02/vrPbnHhzW9m ByaPJUt+Mnl8ufyZLYApissmJTUnsyy1SN8ugSujYUMfa0ELW8XTu9+ZGxgbWLsYOTkkBEwk lh/eww5hi0lcuLeeDcQWEjjMKDF9ApS9llHi+As+EJtXQFti+YLJjCA2i4CqRH/jdrA5bAJO Ev0LTrOA2KICURJHl1xlh6gXlDg58wlYXETASuLW0W6wXmYBEYnrEx+D9QoL2Er8fXkdKm4h MXP+eShbXmL72znMEDeoSXx6+5B9AiP/LCRjZyFpmYWkZQEj8ypG0eLU4qTcdCNjvdSizOTi 4vw8vbzUkk2MwOA7uOW36g7Gy28cDzEKcDAq8fB+UMoME2JNLCuuzD3EKMHBrCTCu2UGUIg3 JbGyKrUoP76oNCe1+BCjNAeLkjhvM9ODUCGB9MSS1OzU1ILUIpgsEwenVAOjaBkru4rLjP08 l/3ltCWW5BjNNJy4b92U5j9l/v7nFxZ9fevZHn9SZBHLhSl7N16VDnzL2PFO/lbmJ52DzVpM 5yf/OCHN+U2HJbP84MRbFSU+Ak+U17ZGLXGdtuQG94rPrWY6X6w3LawV22X387XOsxtPNud8 KhQ3N/a0iBATC9ZbVrFcIkhEiaU4I9FQi7moOBEAf1xb+ToCAAA=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/fl_NUDz9rPGE-Jq4LUpe8L3YqWw>
Cc: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:23:25 -0000
Hi, Please find below some comments on the draft, mainly based on ID nits: Section 11.2.1 describes a computation algorithm. Moving this section to draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm may be considered. ** The abstract seems to contain reference RFC5286, which it shouldn't. Please replace those with straight textual mentions of the documents in question. ** Downref: Normative reference to an Informational RFC: RFC 5714 -- Unused Reference: RFC2328 -- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 3137 (Obsoleted by RFC 6987) == Outdated reference: draft-ietf-rtgwg-ipfrr-notvia-addresses has been published as RFC 6981 == Outdated reference: draft-ietf-rtgwg-ordered-fib has been published as RFC 6976 Best regards, Janos
- Comments on draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture… János Farkas