IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Comments on draft-shaikh-rtgwg-policy-model

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Mon, 27 July 2015 21:30 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 934FA1B325B for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.578
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.578 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8t-zrmK-nUAi for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0488C1B3212 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3AB701E378; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 17:32:23 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 17:32:23 -0400
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: Antoni Przygienda <antoni.przygienda@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: Comments on draft-shaikh-rtgwg-policy-model
Message-ID: <20150727213223.GC16809@pfrc.org>
References: <20150722073931.GB30425@puck.nether.net> <etPan.55af51be.69dfac96.36f@corretto.local> <9439_1437568985_55AF8FD9_9439_5180_1_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF92166A398C@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <D1D97D09.29830%acee@cisco.com> <20150727155051.GF24197@pfrc.org> <7A2D9D5A-CCAF-4C8B-B2BC-C8DC1F05F5AF@cisco.com> <20150727191203.GA16809@pfrc.org> <2E4BB27CAB87BF43B4207C0E55860F180EA898A4@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> <20150727203522.GB16809@pfrc.org> <2E4BB27CAB87BF43B4207C0E55860F180EA89A87@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2E4BB27CAB87BF43B4207C0E55860F180EA89A87@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/gCBt9cNv0DApIjJnU0VfQ6iDlI8>
Cc: "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 21:30:13 -0000

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 09:04:34PM +0000, Antoni Przygienda wrote:
> Answers expected, I'll look it up once some first version is available.
> More than RPSL ? intriguing. RPSL was a closed algebra with closure so I
> really want to see how  this baby is  even better ;-)  Linear programming? 

Better is arguable.  More flexible and inside-a-box complete, perhaps.

>From a functional standpoint, the stuff has branch logic.  All else could
collapse out to the same arguments of yore, but this simple detail makes
things a lot more palatable to policy consumers and writers.

-- Jeff

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email