Re: draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa Table 1 questions

"Francois Clad (fclad)" <fclad@cisco.com> Wed, 24 July 2019 17:22 UTC

Return-Path: <fclad@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4F312015B; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 10:22:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=TytNdqvT; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=Rm3ND2vB
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a-lN8gQ2fcLO; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 10:22:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98A5812028E; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 10:22:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3828; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1563988952; x=1565198552; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=OoefbiWEuPJFIHArV0VxCCmTA9YNkXAmiwV2ElLpuZ8=; b=TytNdqvTMcQFo+dU8wbg6aD5qxhpcpEtKgI5KADSo5qStzQgtH1dKFvJ FBV10WncqsyQ8TTRG3VL9iEPyHqNfyuwW9mO+oDd7l6NB0tqn8EufwasF TiXfNd5S63x/h+qZLMlWM9FaRHUIOJ3nhergpFspLwX9ApBw7KyI3GjVU w=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:M+UKkRGLzi6H7p3SjOs3lJ1GYnJ96bzpIg4Y7IYmgLtSc6Oluo7vJ1Hb+e4w3A3SRYuO7fVChqKWqK3mVWEaqbe5+HEZON0pNVcejNkO2QkpAcqLE0r+efDhayU2NM9DT1RiuXq8NBsdFQ==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BpAACAkjhd/5xdJa1mHQEBBQEHBQGBUwgBCwGBQ1ADgUIgBAsqhB2DRwOEUogpTItjjXyBLoEkA1QJAQEBDAEBLQIBAYRAAheCQiM0CQ4BAwEBBAEBAgEGbYUeDIVLAgEDEhERDAEBOA8CAQgaAiYCAgIfERUQAgQBEiKDAIFrAx0BAqFnAoE4iGBxgTKCeQEBBYUMDQuCEwmBDCgBi18XgUA/gREnH4JMPoIagioXgnQygiaMKIJUjWuNSEAJAoIZkBmDdxuCLYcljjiNN4k/jhUCBAIEBQIOAQEFgVA4gVhwFWUBgkGCQoNxilNygSmOAAEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,303,1559520000"; d="scan'208";a="383579087"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 24 Jul 2019 17:22:31 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (xch-rcd-002.cisco.com [173.37.102.12]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x6OHMVgW015417 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 24 Jul 2019 17:22:31 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (173.37.102.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 12:22:30 -0500
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 13:22:28 -0400
Received: from NAM02-BL2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 12:22:28 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=ZwJim5eOebZTXKsDwiE/BQEbNqOoG4o62UHWkJgV9eH4Rlvx0XQfYTvs+i0ythZ91Y42ZAQt1O1Bgh0mRsgM7FNBhbDXPx6syBBRATKCnzHZHl6o4lNmzwBJ4MYzUkyahn7xA1YAO9X1F4zDAo4HUsGHx4/5aqvcv//2N5rJBZTYTokMsn7QPly1YXjjgp0k38clIgdQYODUhYrq8185p+09EpQlMv0IwVpRDXSYJtY70Mw8voVuYNXSZER4niZoJ84TWbu4PGDqL/+7+XfWnb6AiJDbBuLVD6hpwNeEUeAKI0VNChPr4LOD5GmNc2bVvClRq15mLpE5IcDYc4wFxg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=OoefbiWEuPJFIHArV0VxCCmTA9YNkXAmiwV2ElLpuZ8=; b=kUbClLVgtU3J5umm6Ukd8/x7VjSPt2BqLry62BfMZO4oOcXFMWQhJHIcTAo2NkrgsTOwLfVM1AbyVNAPyh4fYBr+JEJhWC6HO6+LolX4gD1DBkAOf3AV6PGZk58dhhiR0oSb2LSEr18iA6BGYm+ase/x4GAR4Jjg4no3V7l8qO0Ud++eVpZRVr3k0VnBl6CFzO48quEln+b9xzTwXIJmeM6wLhj2lNa24zNG8pB7y3g4lZgvYHNwEIHMyeUt2VX/BfFHs+k1GNbgaOLHNWYTrn9aekBDgeKqUD2Kv8PpsmQD8+TL6pS2WCilsZ7N0teMLiCgRXsCFxXkqumZkIoSnA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1;spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com;dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com;arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=OoefbiWEuPJFIHArV0VxCCmTA9YNkXAmiwV2ElLpuZ8=; b=Rm3ND2vBSJHfeQcJbq11dWME8B4lp3s1OL0dyiBD7Rn/n+Z80/BzL5G/GMqusIiT8eW9wFvwP8wr8vlXUleK0MB9NRjFjEhY5zlYt51re03Xo11xQ8RR0HvORvQy+Xr1H0GWtWQSQtLpp6xfmSByzSUAzkTHAFtjmKxvm7ZuptU=
Received: from MN2PR11MB3824.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.254.87) by MN2PR11MB3568.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.251.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2094.16; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 17:22:27 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB3824.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::112b:6fa8:1927:4972]) by MN2PR11MB3824.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::112b:6fa8:1927:4972%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2115.005; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 17:22:27 +0000
From: "Francois Clad (fclad)" <fclad@cisco.com>
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa Table 1 questions
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa Table 1 questions
Thread-Index: AQHVQKaQ/wSaDWHHOUKVVV4SCcxl0abZxFwA
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 17:22:26 +0000
Message-ID: <A501BDD1-7FA8-456A-931F-14110D33FBD6@cisco.com>
References: <b0799dbf-f0fc-d1d0-543c-38049141ce9b@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <b0799dbf-f0fc-d1d0-543c-38049141ce9b@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=fclad@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c0:1008::2b6]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 6867f5a4-c7ad-4402-1c4c-08d7105b8010
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:MN2PR11MB3568;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB3568:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB356807D3293F1E4AABC4AA02ACC60@MN2PR11MB3568.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 0108A997B2
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(136003)(396003)(376002)(366004)(346002)(39860400002)(85664002)(189003)(199004)(71200400001)(71190400001)(76176011)(478600001)(68736007)(102836004)(110136005)(53936002)(186003)(36756003)(6506007)(6116002)(6246003)(7736002)(8676002)(2201001)(305945005)(6486002)(6436002)(486006)(11346002)(46003)(446003)(2616005)(476003)(6512007)(33656002)(86362001)(66476007)(81156014)(66946007)(25786009)(66556008)(2501003)(66446008)(76116006)(64756008)(14454004)(5660300002)(81166006)(91956017)(2906002)(8936002)(229853002)(99286004)(316002)(256004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB3568; H:MN2PR11MB3824.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: GaOKUQWOfoUuGH29GhxCY3jDkyg2/qAvesWx73XqfGR+nH/cioYX9m7IEr2+nIPHtMxOwiHgXQGqQpa7L6kH064K2ndirPuzWP2OhHyzoSBn7UMnZNXNt0V1AyP8RllRa8SbEC6PBRMnUgt/6FgoN1wek78ikAs3j8gTOqZvVNF31DID3xldKd7uqG5kbsyPwR8NfsvCvFDAxgp4zJbSygbn9dn3SChvcJfuKh5oBbL2ZyG6iUXUgTBYOBccxxl2Md1A9uAy99cxD9Gwu44X+SSPZghLhsnqoD+KYXBm/n9fwS/+wteNsfk4gnaeFFkYQjMtiV7w+8RWnTpPqIoa1BktpzlRXh2kjRk3nYExQt5PoKWy/GIqOSQh7LXzonGSTctrI5cwPVbVWTlglDagad2IAo9nmzkssJoQuUneK9k=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <D915BC3457E4F54AB17C8C6915F2CA57@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 6867f5a4-c7ad-4402-1c4c-08d7105b8010
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 24 Jul 2019 17:22:27.0723 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: fclad@cisco.com
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB3568
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.12, xch-rcd-002.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-5.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/grDK-DeZEkYmQ4T-9RPThSlCEOo>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 17:22:38 -0000

Hi Stewart,

Thank you for pointing that out.

The term circuits in the third column refers to bi-directional links. For the sake of clarity, we propose to replace it with “links” and multiply all values in the third column by 2.

It also appears that a glitch occurred when the link/node ratios were reported in this table 1.

Below is the updated table.

   +-------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+
   |   Network   |    Nodes   |    Links   |Link-to-Node| SRLG info? |
   |             |            |            |    Ratio   |            |
   +-------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+
   |    T1       |    408     |     1330   |    3.26    |    Yes     |
   +-------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+
   |    T2       |    587     |     2166   |    3.69    |     No     |
   +-------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+
   |    T3       |    93      |      802   |    8.62    |    Yes     |
   +-------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+
   |    T4       |    247     |      786   |    3.18    |    Yes     |
   +-------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+
   |    T5       |    34      |      192   |    5.65    |    Yes     |
   +-------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+
   |    T6       |    50      |      156   |    3.12    |     No     |
   +-------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+
   |    T7       |    82      |      586   |    7.15    |     No     |
   +-------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+
   |    T8       |    35      |      82    |    2.34    |    Yes     |
   +-------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+
   |    T9       |    177     |     2742   |    15.49   |    Yes     |
   +-------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+

Regards,
Francois

On 22/07/2019 12:00, "Stewart Bryant" <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> wrote:

    I would like to understand what Table 1 in 
    draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa is telling us.
    
    It uses the terms links and circuits without distinguishing between the 
    two. I could speculate that a circuit is a group of links, but then the 
    ratio of nodes to circuits in T1 seems far too low at less than 1:1 in 
    network T1.
    
    Then the node to link ratio sounds quite high with fan outs of 84:1 in T2.
    
    Please could you explain what you mean by circuits and links in this table.
    
    What I would like to know is the average ratio of nodes to neighbours, 
    and the number of parallel links per neighbour.
    
    Best regards
    
    Stewart