Re: [Idr] Tunnel-Encap Gaps for SD-WAN described in draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-gap-analysis-02.txt

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Wed, 26 June 2019 23:09 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC66D120099 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:09:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9os2KaqQHw2M for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:09:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82d.google.com (mail-qt1-x82d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0B6912018B for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:09:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82d.google.com with SMTP id y57so460145qtk.4 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:09:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=v/S8vDCrUnKx5AiN7U836gG93WHkS1BQqealTK75k3Q=; b=VlW9Bj7aVWOVtbm7OG/qrrSWDV7GLA3NxdwI+7Aol9jK0bxpokAUU3HcqNuhg8cQ4Z WweHdvMslj3SkA9fDWb5+heG1qeUMpFexNjSJgceiEg1ji92jgDPOa/KT+jUCdV6k0qc KYxPTlWT2wlOTQhgkR6zuD5TDdRkw1s65lXTmeAlBiE/SgUqDB+m7JFpIP2hvxMeYO/h b3S7tcccDW9GGliK0mEOX4URGMHy7xBGxTX6SRE+KhesGoNcnFCrmNLrkR48TiVKsuSE gqYOC3KhTWJttlJIAZ7MeeXZL+usRO4hcDxdxCnW0KKsyRxLBgSlbZXX+C6abIyOkknc 7bDA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=v/S8vDCrUnKx5AiN7U836gG93WHkS1BQqealTK75k3Q=; b=dLvWr2mj7AjvFTR8qlhxwucOumaOruaiY2RGW/hQORwUasXdQ0m05+W/ykNpyckcgI 9xFYYYfCCAUVFnRydADWjBCyycdb3kFWXiqJTLYqMjNsr9/7TGfPeEgfWztzVwnuMB1N 9igi6WW79uJz2sdaTn8fW9OKnKYSBSiQ8XmRnzLymqV1loLAVctg8iW8PvsH0tJCVjeJ PWH4u4u115MPFANPZQEFFHkE+S54iCWYHrSNEg4FgmfS9tmn7oYoqVSCGUvPQyaUX4VJ l3Ig2YpOTNmCZkHGJgIpQgFOcOM+DmDTacUNi/Jqjse+p40LCGEUth6ATbIv6JIsoI45 mO6Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX4ray5PTEArNAJvrcvTTzUjUJ8tR2jC72FkrjOJMIKJs5oSxee rNDVyy/qtv6RNmuyRLoKFmwNYjAxzbU8DP1UoLxc1A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwXPTGdPXnVuwSWjYC8jSktEuT6u78lEibKkaw46SeyuSXuEavNdvYn9LpwkKQ6w9kvAD69r3OGV4/bykr++oU=
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:9891:: with SMTP id f17mr369413qvd.49.1561590565954; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:09:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <MN2PR13MB358267E50BCEB2E7795046B785E50@MN2PR13MB3582.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <BYAPR05MB5029672CA347E6EC1B94E476C7E40@BYAPR05MB5029.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <MN2PR13MB358228DB2D7DD56204660F6985E40@MN2PR13MB3582.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <BYAPR05MB502933857FE0AFBA3390734DC7E40@BYAPR05MB5029.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <MN2PR13MB3582B880C792E0519A3A91C385E40@MN2PR13MB3582.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <BYAPR05MB5029581D97C82FA968601CCDC7E70@BYAPR05MB5029.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <MN2PR13MB35826741E00B40BBFE12616085E70@MN2PR13MB3582.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <4F580631-0E2D-4311-9EDC-E25A4862DD84@juniper.net> <BYAPR05MB5029D7B984EB0506C7773E63C7E20@BYAPR05MB5029.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMH-0qBkaroKJEdtjM1-7-ZjOY1mWBkS7hLo8FOC_5A+Og@mail.gmail.com> <BYAPR05MB50295A1AC3FB482F39249D0AC7E20@BYAPR05MB5029.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <MN2PR13MB3582DDE034FA9E1C1D4970CD85E20@MN2PR13MB3582.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <76C21490-A26F-4C88-9F04-FBE6B0F07D41@juniper.net> <MN2PR13MB358203E404B3A94C7D3F15AA85E20@MN2PR13MB3582.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR13MB358203E404B3A94C7D3F15AA85E20@MN2PR13MB3582.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 01:09:15 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOj+MME1miW80Ows=L1hx_T4B+596bLmjAeTwvrW0Z5JMY_iKA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Tunnel-Encap Gaps for SD-WAN described in draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-gap-analysis-02.txt
To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>
Cc: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>, John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f7fe89058c4222e9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/guKkESHLAI7PvtSOt_TfRxgIJbc>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 23:09:30 -0000

>
>  I am just curious if all other TLVs/subTLVs of BGP's UPDATEs must be
> present with value NULL (0) to emphasize that it is not accidently omitted?
>

They do not need to be present with NULL (0) value, but no one is drawing
any conclusion on missing attributes. Here you still want to implicitly
take next hops and treat it as tunnel endpoint - as John mentioned that
could be possible if spec would define such behavior when tunnel attribute
is present and Remote Endpoint Sub-TLV is not there. But I am not sure
however if there is sufficient value to it.

[Linda] Isn’t the Source Address of the UPDATE message same as the
> originating node of the UPDATE message?
>

No. Think about going via RRs as a basic example.

Thx,
R.

>