Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-08: (with COMMENT)
Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Thu, 11 January 2018 09:27 UTC
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietf.org
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A15124D6C; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 01:27:41 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip@ietf.org, Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.qu@huawei.com>, rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org, yingzhen.qu@huawei.com, rtgwg@ietf.org, tinatsou6@gmail.com
Subject: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-08: (with COMMENT)
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.68.3
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <151566286178.19680.2391072298747892969.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 01:27:41 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/hCoSEdPUcoyFZr5zyUM61YGB25c>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 09:27:42 -0000
Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-08: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- OPS DIR review from Tina: I found this document well written to be READY for publication as an informational document. Some nits: 4.2 eBGP Labeled Unicast (RFC8277) Each node peers with its neighbors via a eBGP session should be Each node peers with its neighbors via an eBGP session 7. Addressing the open problems the same could be re-used in context of other domains as well A period is missing in the end. Are the centralized controller and centralized agent the same components? Even though the design in this document is specified for same domain, it would be useful to develop an approach for inter-domain without leaking intra-domain topology and policy. Have this feature been included or being aligned with carrier grade FIB in FD.io VPP https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP ?
- Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-… Benoit Claise
- RE: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rt… Xufeng Liu
- Re: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rt… Acee Lindem (acee)