RE: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-08: (with COMMENT)

Xufeng Liu <Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com> Wed, 17 January 2018 21:19 UTC

Return-Path: <Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582E5126FDC; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 13:19:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.14
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.14 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=jabil.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AgAFMfWCBuNE; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 13:19:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NAM03-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam03on0133.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.42.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 164BE126C19; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 13:19:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jabil.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-jabil-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=X3cWv2h/tAfXBGTdzBbf6uSWaG26C02FOleuWQKtfyE=; b=EEzz3KUvXwlTdYI+gyq/p2/fRpG+ZMECrpLqrLYBa1rQPdc9Zq3pNHs5V7+0oZZdsMi+dYQvaQwjsoZjDMYYgmDK+pCKekUgHbaDPKpEWJyT2oeotvYtQiO7LQfb/QymNVO63wq8NUFE3+rn6YgQ1mWtvftXh6u9PMC5JRP8tMQ=
Received: from BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.160.154.13) by BN3PR0201MB0978.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.161.207.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.407.7; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 21:18:58 +0000
Received: from BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.154.13]) by BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.154.13]) with mapi id 15.20.0407.012; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 21:18:58 +0000
From: Xufeng Liu <Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip@ietf.org>, Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.qu@huawei.com>, "rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org" <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, "yingzhen.qu@huawei.com" <yingzhen.qu@huawei.com>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>, "tinatsou6@gmail.com" <tinatsou6@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-08: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Topic: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-08: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHTir5xNm6t2u/HzkKsbIc4FNC1uaN4m3Xw
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 21:18:58 +0000
Message-ID: <BN3PR0201MB0867AAEB612362FFCB90FE2DF1E90@BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References: <151566286178.19680.2391072298747892969.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <151566286178.19680.2391072298747892969.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-dg-ref: PG1ldGE+PGF0IG5tPSJib2R5LnR4dCIgcD0iYzpcdXNlcnNceGxpdVxhcHBkYXRhXHJvYW1pbmdcMDlkODQ5YjYtMzJkMy00YTQwLTg1ZWUtNmI4NGJhMjllMzViXG1zZ3NcbXNnLWYzMWQzNDQ2LWZiY2ItMTFlNy05YzQwLTE4NWUwZmUzYzQ1Y1xhbWUtdGVzdFxmMzFkMzQ0OC1mYmNiLTExZTctOWM0MC0xODVlMGZlM2M0NWNib2R5LnR4dCIgc3o9IjIzMjQiIHQ9IjEzMTYwNjk3NTA0NzIyMjIyNSIgaD0iVEZrVElrZGRPeVB5cTZxMU5WalNBRVpUMmU4PSIgaWQ9IiIgYmw9IjAiIGJvPSIxIi8+PC9tZXRhPg==
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com;
x-originating-ip: [98.191.72.170]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN3PR0201MB0978; 7:Mqn8D7cQZk6pgAh25YCsU3eNn+uoX9LyAhm77sdhtOITKynm068fvxKxll9AsbcScO1930Z/WMLTz8m2H7gfgCn2WcgoUkbfzTmgmLk0OcfSEPc0H2j22c8Cl4EI0/3W26Av3x69gbPHA1mAXgtUuQNkczC+pD/z+Vbsjr2kbziHm1eCKZIJpmIpwGjTd0qcSRT8rTqFs9ewGvGwZ/4U6hE6ce1YZAJ3J1AxyUP+7dHGjr/kyIN6N3lFUWXj7JHl
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 2932f143-a462-4eb0-8903-08d55defec5f
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652020)(48565401081)(5600026)(4604075)(3008032)(2017052603307)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:BN3PR0201MB0978;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN3PR0201MB0978:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN3PR0201MB0978B789684CBC84D30E7A1BF1E90@BN3PR0201MB0978.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(120809045254105)(50582790962513)(85827821059158)(95692535739014);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040470)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(3231023)(944501161)(93006095)(93001095)(6055026)(6041268)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123562045)(20161123564045)(20161123558120)(20161123560045)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:BN3PR0201MB0978; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000803101)(100110400095); SRVR:BN3PR0201MB0978;
x-forefront-prvs: 0555EC8317
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(346002)(376002)(396003)(39860400002)(366004)(39380400002)(13464003)(189003)(199004)(76176011)(6116002)(9686003)(7696005)(5660300001)(74316002)(66066001)(7736002)(6306002)(33656002)(55016002)(8936002)(86362001)(316002)(81156014)(81166006)(77096007)(2900100001)(14454004)(4326008)(3846002)(72206003)(25786009)(53936002)(305945005)(6436002)(54906003)(99286004)(68736007)(2906002)(102836004)(110136005)(80792005)(8676002)(478600001)(3660700001)(26005)(3280700002)(6506007)(39060400002)(2950100002)(229853002)(105586002)(230783001)(97736004)(966005)(6246003)(53546011)(106356001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3PR0201MB0978; H:BN3PR0201MB0867.namprd02.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: jabil.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 2xFOghtxBqg5LnWZx2UvP17SQBpP8oeNlA4JDTDnLTZ+OxK+mfTDyE7BmlEU5On5f03HMT8r+rMX+7hjTEqzDw==
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: jabil.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 2932f143-a462-4eb0-8903-08d55defec5f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 17 Jan 2018 21:18:58.6262 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bc876b21-f134-4c12-a265-8ed26b7f0f3b
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3PR0201MB0978
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/hDk5Yz2LNLw3pn_Ou2rPLb4jwCI>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 21:19:01 -0000

Hi Benoit,

The comments below from Tina seem to be for a different document. Could you please double check?

Thanks,
- Xufeng

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benoit Claise [mailto:bclaise@cisco.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 4:28 AM
> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip@ietf.org; Yingzhen Qu
> <yingzhen.qu@huawei.com>; rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org; yingzhen.qu@huawei.com;
> rtgwg@ietf.org; tinatsou6@gmail.com
> Subject: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-08: (with
> COMMENT)
> 
> Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-08: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory
> paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> OPS DIR review from Tina:
> 
> I found this document well written to be READY for publication as an
> informational document.
> 
> Some nits:
> 
> 4.2 eBGP Labeled Unicast (RFC8277)
> 
> Each node peers with its neighbors via a eBGP session
> 
> should be
> 
> Each node peers with its neighbors via an eBGP session
> 
> 7.  Addressing the open problems
> 
> the same could be re-used in context of
>    other domains as well
> 
> A period is missing in the end.
> 
> Are the centralized controller and centralized agent the same components?
> 
> Even though the design in this document is specified for same domain, it would
> be useful to develop an approach for inter-domain without leaking intra-domain
> topology and policy.
> 
> Have this feature been included or being aligned with carrier grade FIB in FD.io
> VPP https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP ?
>