Re: [LIAISONS] New Liaison Statement, "IESG follow-up regarding 'Potential RTGWG work related to the disaggregated BNG architecture'"

[April Nowicki <[e-mail]>]

Hi Alissa,

This liaison statement is well received, thank you.

BBF, this has been added to Jira as LIAISE-355
<https://issues.broadband-forum.org/browse/LIAISE-355>.

Thank you.
April



*April Nowicki*

Member Support Manager

Broadband Forum

Office: [phone]

Mobile: [phone]




On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 1:22 AM Liaison Statement Management Tool <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Title: IESG follow-up regarding 'Potential RTGWG work related to the
> disaggregated BNG architecture'
> Submission Date: 2019-11-21
> URL of the IETF Web page: https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1662/
>
> From: Alissa Cooper <[e-mail]>
> To: [e-mail]
> Cc: The IESG <[e-mail]>,The IETF Chair <[e-mail]>,
> [e-mail],[e-mail],[e-mail]
> Response Contacts: The IETF Chair <[e-mail]>
> Technical Contacts: [e-mail]
> Purpose: In response
>
> Referenced liaison: Potential RTGWG work related to the disaggregated BNG
> architecture (https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1615/)
>
> Referenced liaison: Response to IETF liaison: ‘Potential RTGWG work
> related to the disaggregated BNG architecture’ (
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1619/)
>
> Referenced liaison: Follow-on response to IETF liaison: ‘Potential RTGWG
> work related to the disaggregated BNG architecture’ (
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1631/)
>
> Referenced liaison: Follow-on to IETF liaison: ‘Potential RTGWG work
> related to the disaggregated BNG architecture’ (
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1651/)
>
> Referenced liaison: Follow-on to IETF liaison: ‘Potential RTGWG work
> related to the disaggregated BNG architecture’ (
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1660/)
>
> Body: The IETF thanks the Broadband Forum for your two liaisons both
> titled, "Follow-on to IETF liaison: 'Potential RTGWG work related to the
> disaggregated BNG architecture'" (
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1660/ and
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1651/). We appreciate the Broadband
> Forum's responsive action on this important topic and your work to keep the
> IETF apprised of your progress, including sharing the draft document with
> details of the ongoing work.
>
> The two liaisons and draft document were recently discussed within the
> IESG. Our conclusion from the liaisons and information provided, is that
> the Broadband Forum's selection of 3GPP's PFCP protocol for use between the
> DBNG Control Plane (CP) and User Plane (UP) indicates there is no current
> need for the IETF to develop a protocol to address this use case.
> Consequently, and in the spirit of cooperation and maintaining the cordial,
> productive relationship between our two organizations, consideration of all
> IETF work related to Disaggregated BNG suspended in March will not be
> resumed.
>
> Should the Broadband Forum require assistance from the IETF on this topic
> going forward, please inform the relevant IETF Area(s) via liaison and we
> will consider the request accordingly.  We look forward to our continued
> work with the Broadband Form, in particular on the many other topics where
> our two organizations are cooperating.
>
> Sincerely,
> Alissa Cooper
> IETF Chair, on behalf of the IESG
> Attachments:
>
> No document has been attached
>
> --
> Please go to
> https://wiki.broadband-forum.org/display/BBF/Join+or+Leave+BBF+Groups+and+Email+Lists
> to manage your email subscriptions, or email [e-mail]
> for assistance.
>
>