Re: WG adoption poll for draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model-07

"Aseem Choudhary (asechoud)" <asechoud@cisco.com> Mon, 03 December 2018 18:44 UTC

Return-Path: <asechoud@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D526E1277BB; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 10:44:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.96
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.96 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-1.459, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qy-cJsGNevma; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 10:44:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBCB01200B3; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 10:44:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3080; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1543862677; x=1545072277; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=yEPHRgen6n2n7t7l6jgZmQ+wHBcaLwWMygtbJFANGRg=; b=fMBT3fxApV9zZiQBic//ivi2C1fSKbHTUtgdkpwWkASDTw/knaY1++eh 1h/9e+SRkrG05dxXucpUFM1wLRHO1bSlEUvcPeu9mhYutRJtGjyOxsUoO t2WtHJII2bqNWngMJfEXv8QEz1KCqtozGQ8ZsODi0vrp38ghWoxhFVEEw 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ADAAACeQVc/5JdJa1aCRkBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEHAQEBAQEBgVEEAQEBAQELAYFaKYFoJwqDb4gYjAyCDYkRjjeBegsBAYRsAheDMCI0CQ0BAwEBAgEBAm0ohTwBAQEBAgEjEUUQAgEIGAICJgICAh8RFRACBA4FHoMDgWoDDQimI4Evh30NghyBC4sRF4FAP4ERJx+CTIJXggCDLjGCJgKJEx0xljEuCQKODIEIgiYYkSaOdIlSAhEUgScfOIFVcBVlAYJBgz0BB40WQTGKP4EfAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,311,1539648000"; d="scan'208";a="487622591"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Dec 2018 18:44:36 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (xch-rcd-005.cisco.com [173.37.102.15]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id wB3Iia87009725 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 3 Dec 2018 18:44:36 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-004.cisco.com (173.37.102.14) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 12:44:36 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-004.cisco.com ([173.37.102.14]) by XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com ([173.37.102.14]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 12:44:36 -0600
From: "Aseem Choudhary (asechoud)" <asechoud@cisco.com>
To: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: WG adoption poll for draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model-07
Thread-Topic: WG adoption poll for draft-asechoud-rtgwg-qos-model-07
Thread-Index: AQHUiR3zYfIvVYtpQkeiGnTNjLVi0aVqes6AgABBwICAAZcsAIABbciA//97MYA=
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 18:44:35 +0000
Message-ID: <7F7AE6B9-481B-4E5D-B79C-9C4A658717BD@cisco.com>
References: <5e6b8c2a-bbc0-4390-b8d8-358477757cf6@Spark> <CA+RyBmU=hckXjH+E8XCT2E+Z0aw7a69Y1hTreA84Ch+ewmWrkQ@mail.gmail.com> <A70F8CFC-E757-4278-B638-8602755B8B08@gmail.com> <FEA957E8-8EB6-49AC-8C60-25BA33BC584F@cisco.com> <F6702D13-9DEC-4F4A-B60D-F5AFA8D37AA6@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <F6702D13-9DEC-4F4A-B60D-F5AFA8D37AA6@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.3.181015
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.154.164.156]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <0050C9BC3A449F4987F4F66B51858BC4@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.15, xch-rcd-005.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-10.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/iHuCjjVbnDV2iHU9aC8zVWkFOVs>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 18:44:40 -0000

Ahh.. got it. 

This is company C example (Section: Example of Company C Diffserv Model).
 It is just an example to indicate how to append the model for each vendor requirements.


Best Regards,
Aseem

On 12/3/18, 10:40 AM, "Fred Baker" <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

    
    
    > On Dec 2, 2018, at 8:50 PM, Aseem Choudhary (asechoud) <asechoud@cisco.com> wrote:
    > 
    > [AC] Diffserv behavior is defined in section 4.  Based on it, policing is defined inline or as template. The priority defined for queuing is not mandatory and hence become priority entry based on whether defined or not. Similarly for min-rate, max-rate. There is no specific reference to MDRR. The queuing actions are defined as per classifier entry or as separate queuing policy.
    
    If there is no reference to MDRR, I find the following confusing:
    
    
         identity mdrr-queuing-policy {
           base compc-qos-policy;
         }
    
       ...
             must "((../sub-type != 'mdrr-queuing-policy') and " +
                  " (../sub-type != 'pwfq-queuing-policy')) or " +
                  "(((../sub-type = 'mdrr-queuing-policy') or " +
                  "  (../sub-type = 'pwfq-queueing-policy')) and " +
       ...
    
           container traffic-queue {
             when "(../sub-type = 'mdrr-queuing-policy') or " +
                  "(../sub-type = 'pwfq-queuing-policy')" {
               description
                 "Queuing policy properties";
             }
    (Twice)
       ...
           case mdrr-queuing-policy {
             when "../../../sub-type = 'mdrr-queuing-policy'" {
               description
                 "MDRR queue handling properties for the traffic " +
                 "classified into current queue";
             }
             leaf mdrr-queue-weight {
               type uint8 {
                 range "20..100";
               }
               units percentage;
             }
           }
    
    
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Victorious warriors win first and then go to war,
    Defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
         Sun Tzu