Re: Request for WG adoption of draft-rtg-dt-encap-02

Jeff and Chris,

I did not see a response to the review comments at http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg/current/msg04924.html <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg/current/msg04924.html>.

Although not mentioned explicitly, the timing was such that these ought to be part of the WG adoption request.

Any consideration to that review and comments? Expectation of a response?

Thanks!

— Carlos.

> On Jun 28, 2015, at 8:10 PM, Jeff Tantsura <jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi
> 
> This poll has ended and there has been sufficient support to adopt the
> draft as the
> working group document.
> 
> Authors, please republish as draft-ietf-rtgwg-dt-encap-00
> 
> Thanks!
> Jeff and Chris
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> 
> From: Jeff Tantsura <jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com>
> Date: Friday, May 22, 2015 at 2:58 PM
> To: "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
> Cc: "rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org" <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>
> Subject: Request for WG adoption of draft-rtg-dt-encap-02
> 
>> Hi RTGWG,
>> 
>> The authors have requested the RTGWG to adopt draft-rtg-dt-encap-02 as
>> working group document.
>> 
>> 
>> Please indicate support or no-support by June 8, 2015.
>> 
>> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
>> this email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.
>> The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will
>> not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each
>> author and each individual that has contributed to the document.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Jeff & Chris
>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> rtgwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Re: Request for WG adoption of draft-rtg-dt-encap-02

Attachment: signature.asc