IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model-09: (with COMMENT)

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Tue, 13 February 2018 17:10 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AEDA12D84C; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 09:10:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.53
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.53 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a52qaT0_rN5N; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 09:10:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 327F2126CE8; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 09:10:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2194; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1518541835; x=1519751435; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=izZ4e9tovukebNTZw1YjxFtj1TJZKPkb5O8lul9agnc=; b=MkRHnyMrS79kItI9naFw73heVuX6SPiNgbPkpDMdMqP+qGGRRmN71eB6 24HjaZb+6YRZNTsRkqwUKvZr2Kbich8k4Ex9zwd065PHoyHYFptDBi59r 0OfAkXL40bNWoFSyOeOGTPOlnbi4DWib5wpx4kw6k0LeUGJs0YHeugH9n c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BSAQDKG4Na/40NJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYNSZnAoCoNbiiSOJoMZlkEVggMKGAuFGAIagk5UGAECAQEBAQEBAmsohSQCBAEBIRE6CxACAQgaAiYCAgIlCxUQAgQBDQWKNRCwFIIniHyCEQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARgFgQ+DcoIVg2iDBYMvAQEBAgGBOgESAR+DFzGCNAWKa5lDCQKIHo1kgh+GKot7ixSCboZfgwoCERkBgTsBHzlgVxEIcBU9KgGCCwEBDoR3eAGLf4ElgRcBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,508,1511827200"; d="scan'208";a="353720368"
Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Feb 2018 17:10:20 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-014.cisco.com (xch-rtp-014.cisco.com [64.101.220.154]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w1DHAK2k007324 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 13 Feb 2018 17:10:20 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-014.cisco.com (64.101.220.154) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 12:10:19 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 12:10:19 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model@ietf.org>, "rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org" <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, "yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com" <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model-09: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Topic: Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model-09: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHToJ0rF+pPJRGZ20Gg1AzE1vwByqOimdKA
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 17:10:19 +0000
Message-ID: <465AE72F-858F-4FA2-BB40-616D7FAEF61B@cisco.com>
References: <151806747640.17184.1735281072604280039.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <151806747640.17184.1735281072604280039.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.195]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <AEFC92483503A84BA5D214B79B5AF28B@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/j5ivQ1CohmQjIrj-pCv1smIwgAo>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 17:10:37 -0000

Hi Adam, 
The -10 version includes IPv6 addresses in the examples.  Note that OSPF router-ids and area-ids are represented in dotted-quad format but are not necessarily IPv4 addresses (although it is common for the unique router-id to be based on an IPv4 loopback address). 
Thanks,
Acee 

On 2/8/18, 12:25 AM, "rtgwg on behalf of Adam Roach" <rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of adam@nostrum.com> wrote:

    Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
    draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model-09: No Objection
    
    When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
    email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
    introductory paragraph, however.)
    
    
    Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
    for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
    
    
    The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model/
    
    
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    COMMENT:
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    All of the examples in §B.1 use IPv4 addresses exclusively. Please update these
    to use all-IPv6 or a mix of IPv4 and IPv6. See
    <https://www.iab.org/2016/11/07/iab-statement-on-ipv6/> for details.
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    rtgwg mailing list
    rtgwg@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email