IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: working group adoption poll for draft-mirsky-bfd-p2mp-vrrp-use-case

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Tue, 26 June 2018 21:46 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D4B130EEB; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 14:46:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AGpini4nzfTR; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 14:46:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x229.google.com (mail-lf0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DD34130E53; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 14:46:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x229.google.com with SMTP id j26-v6so10626133lfb.11; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 14:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=M8zbpg/WeqBojPw5cLZQxBhRFKSTcuFV4W1W9jpwCaY=; b=E3rx+xAkIeL/BZB7ASfEee/qxQiQFZ+PdyUPF0QB8FAk6pCoSzBAfEb3hnPOqXbyVh c44Xgb+wJEESNo1YWN93izyFUged8yQ/TuclRzBl4Vougc1PEYYuRCCJicXbRvi5kl5e mMEn5NOLRv8WmX6948cEMItqSAxLA2VLDcY+A8ZmzA9i6/yhC3OQ3Sgw0bGKA03n0f7V BmrDw1QToiPBOawWRS21zVhvT3jNVvs3JhmEX7Roy0swtU2jaSw8jiZbyAQWMjN7+rfO 8H6e85qWsecgkmyrD5l8mk7h3Qf+/kcW8RXQqZsA1UT+7vH4DEQ5eYnDJA8ucTpKGjvy v0Ww==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=M8zbpg/WeqBojPw5cLZQxBhRFKSTcuFV4W1W9jpwCaY=; b=s21Jj4p0zEnS7Fgjj7C2DL8R59qKA7HNdMUNrfElEdpF0mKHBCGqhdxaTB24ZzDlm0 aSmC2wdxR2mNYDfyO28aWNerEvssPEJ+C9zn6fA1GGZmbkbOyKLKJx86I/XNDN1JKnG3 uQeaHAtcGWY4DNqtx/64c7QS18cQ5FY0CAyZ6WkieqwQTDPYHBl9WMfVw5CPb5XHNkOb 2UUShncsPxAriikwTkxTGxmzhtGRsim1EdZQ9F0q/Ij4pMAkPsvnKCevdT/tPZHM9BeR 2uwD9LNoag6yzwceX4m2/qDzzc5dJt8cDKu9VACA2fQH0lUMyuTBgiLaaws5MHXEAXwB pI4Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E2eJRwWn4SSFKZA8xHbCGa1w8O99wMZHz+Is6GLfguS/HXLDz58 l0Q4dhGYBDMJZRyL6fTSn6cYCk5uCBfFe4HnuaE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpflHhBXQsnMeqT/9Yih8GJlnaEdYwHjn7jb/lGO3xSmlYgjSB5tMJjTkgZnv6Ma8zxjYT/Cxte4/tb+S0FRccc=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:a283:: with SMTP id l125-v6mr2487542lfe.100.1530049613102; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 14:46:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a2e:6e08:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 14:46:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHzoHbvoV209Xq_B_+TUL=YzHy6FDzn=wpi83CAjm=A2yG371g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHzoHbvoV209Xq_B_+TUL=YzHy6FDzn=wpi83CAjm=A2yG371g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 14:46:52 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmU+5+TFTKFSKYrHuriamG+jX2WbMD36EbLBf=pGVSj3vg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: working group adoption poll for draft-mirsky-bfd-p2mp-vrrp-use-case
To: Chris Bowers <chrisbowers.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>, rtg-bfd@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ad8401056f926f73"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/k60lE3jpIUzOupPs15WaOcjRfC0>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 21:46:58 -0000

Yes, support WG adoption as co-author

Regards,
Greg

On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:46 AM, Chris Bowers <chrisbowers.ietf@gmail.com>
wrote:

> RTGWG,
>
> The authors of draft-mirsky-bfd-p2mp-vrrp-use-case have requested
> that RTGWG adopt this draft as a WG document.
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-bfd-p2mp-vrrp-use-case/
>
> Please indicate whether or not you support adoption of the draft
> as a WG document.  An explanation of why or why not is also very helpful.
>
> The two authors have already indicated that they know of no relevant IPR
> other than what has already been disclosed. The draft has two IPR
> disclosures.
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3133/
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3135/
>
> For some history related to this draft, please see:
> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg/current/msg06572.html
>
> For information about IPR in IETF technology, see RFC 8179.
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8179/
>
> Note that one of the basic principles regarding how the IETF deals with
> IPR claims (from RFC 8179)
> is that: "The IETF will make no determination about the validity of any
> particular IPR claim."
>
> Since Jeff Tantsura is a co-author, he will not be involved in judging
> consensus.
>
> The closing date for this poll is Friday, July 6th.
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
>
>
>
>
>

v2.1.27 | Report a Bug | By Email