IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RTGWG WGLC draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model

Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 29 November 2017 15:19 UTC

Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46FEC12762F; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 07:19:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AYZhJT1XDSDg; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 07:19:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x229.google.com (mail-wm0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 542C7124B18; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 07:19:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x229.google.com with SMTP id f9so6715965wmh.0; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 07:19:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OjWxMIadVnnE4QkpHjh177zR4W8Q8ZRIMUpqPalZFAA=; b=OcalglMtbiK01cSBNGnIL/r/1qblaFDV5VSNMPWxAhQLr54BLlycHOckZK3TICqw+v QnQUA3x/J0uDOu96RbBJcVOSl7TLXh2yvEtWnrRbDq9C3ALQpJSxTaHWilV8F4QPa/99 tvtIpVDOhQtdPY6SeZMO3m0vb0+2qVzHm0hJDVRfZeUBvo3HamNvxxk4abtpgIK85+ho WuQvOjCCa4AgRHqabub97PGzOIA1/LK7R7rgrFsU2vKbR11sgHqrulonwrPEPdVILrGY 8uKaUrGVlGu83izSzcYUTbjZDD88gVj0CNRZiWIlhPTTqsN+VP8WH7aRGdqZuvL+URhI Dwgg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id :thread-topic:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=OjWxMIadVnnE4QkpHjh177zR4W8Q8ZRIMUpqPalZFAA=; b=rdfIsVQqDPIikffTnqLeINtUaZqOTtjT8zmQ+447qc6BazBefDi2P4eyLVkeWQfScD TFBXCy/K1kkVnXp9N3cibRlAll5psJt7V0fS6nkpMeXYfxbv9+RP2g+RWhWXqPT5gTpe P60EnlO5uuxonQ+hSPiYxLv2A3itkMzAbOv0DkQIDeddFIXkAAp4EHngTt4mP9w7Sv1L JVwOPbMtL8S2bticJKmHGPvvv8JbGkiGAImTGot06LEilem8H2mi2Fi0vH9LaRJ9zxln 6KdIt68+CkLsrAsRc7t+fC76PolY4fhnHewU97EES90WptwXem+j2epeLoKTY4MAWBLT nsSA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX7u2C1zUn6CbS+wlGqvGMvKDlOzYFHSnMHhnrccn5+i/6vQ2RDz J5QeSvZLpRXL7sKcUj8LqkiNwAS1
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMazwRAmGJRHGUtvOfE4tOoaL3WUMHHAk/tXfVpglHnFn99zgdVu8ig5o4IPJEYuvEolgrBRsw==
X-Received: by 10.80.186.97 with SMTP id 30mr8369697eds.275.1511968760550; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 07:19:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.103.249.65] ([195.219.17.131]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s6sm1667513edd.23.2017.11.29.07.19.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 29 Nov 2017 07:19:19 -0800 (PST)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.28.0.171108
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 07:19:24 -0800
Subject: Re: RTGWG WGLC draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
To: RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
CC: 'rtgwg-chairs' <rtgwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, Rtg-dt-yang-arch <rtg-dt-yang-arch-bounces@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <057FE797-3FDA-41A3-BB75-E9CCBC7D3D88@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: RTGWG WGLC draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model
References: <B08AEDA6-EE43-41D1-B829-CDCDC3C5BF5F@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <B08AEDA6-EE43-41D1-B829-CDCDC3C5BF5F@gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/kMlxsoiaEtVm_ZZCY678KBb9P5g>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 15:19:24 -0000

Dear RTGWG,

The WGLC has been concluded, after the authors will have shepherd comments addressed the draft will be submitted to the IESG.  

Cheers,
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Monday, October 23, 2017 at 14:17
To: RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Cc: 'rtgwg-chairs' <rtgwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, Rtg-dt-yang-arch <rtg-dt-yang-arch-bounces@ietf.org>
Subject: RTGWG WGLC draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model

    Dear RTGWG,
    
    The authors have requested the RTGWG to last call draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model.
    
    The interdependencies related to draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount have been addressed.
    There was consensus that document is ready for the last call during the last IETF meeting 
    and the authors have addressed all the comments from Directorate QA review and YANGDOCTORS.
    Please indicate support or no-support by November 6, 2017.
    
    IPR:
    If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to this 
    email of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. 
    The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list.
    The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been 
    received from each author and each individual that has contributed to the document.
    
    Thanks,
    Jeff & Chris

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email