Re: Mail regarding draft-hu-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection

Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@futurewei.com> Thu, 16 January 2020 15:24 UTC

Return-Path: <huaimo.chen@futurewei.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB5112008B; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 07:24:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=futurewei.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4vUA-DGMJVZz; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 07:24:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NAM11-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn8nam11on2092.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.236.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF78B120099; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 07:24:25 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=azU3SIv2DAS/8RtFD0tG0eCG2NkeWGkmdg6dotk2ofDI4T/3ie5SYNizgf2/nxgA5Winc66y+wg80XF8Vh2kWXOpfrERs2iG8I/Ec/ImLWGsR2d3LH45s6d6nKTF/KYO9TtfthkYFA46NR10FRYsxr/hrv+f4BgMq9HtX4GkHPg/aQQxD7TM8YcchhNKF8XMt1SJSYMezG0BIY5ukd6uOWsIwzBwHSIs5yp0cHPedNiIcNdkUbo8AQHUvAt9FJNA1eXT0jX9AZdqvkCe+FEWgdQsyBOvU1Mk+wrRUqCzqwhSBwjUb3pjxPS7oxCcOy4INPBouBccjktD20mYkkkC4w==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Hud2JMr3aOmYVt98rWtO7sAFuGu2hutd0v6dckZGFEE=; b=l2Rm0ZG3CDGFYIUoPzWiGMIQNQl9d1qi/TryBf/U+ggcMD3HB1uptN1uQyFLwqCv7YFJWgF5Naep9ACLq/GPDsKjEK2FsrMyOfClQrcYq4gjGaCk2FPW8KI4cLguOfNrhsr7jggbpbCc0vnwN1yK0ZmWOOXdirEeVxOCcGGIw8hSPfzyy+58oo0iXl2VI0YL1wW70iEldn/qzgwhzsxnwZZIjhlIJuKqTxGGyhBwtOyJ7lYYB077ljmqK9jhwWzKsq6OE1qVaRTLDrpquJ2lKcbtXQ8idaZzcNjqBYls0+1NqqgA9FC5jQWrMVP96WIxzT7AfbFWbteXGzoSUkl1Sw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=futurewei.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=futurewei.com; dkim=pass header.d=futurewei.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=Futurewei.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Hud2JMr3aOmYVt98rWtO7sAFuGu2hutd0v6dckZGFEE=; b=f2aU6XNGswlbFTQAXBkuXt4vbgdokS1aumcaD8tULzJExkK/uv8qY0gCYtQ1wq/ARoCEXf7ZEWBN+z/267SMB/1yj3CSGll4UfQbJ0YPfe2pmnTQkFIEju80aQ8hF/OQsRmS0WmYXG5jg9LPPRP1Rt8nNGc2jSCcw9XeG1/4YSc=
Received: from SN6PR13MB2271.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (52.135.93.160) by SN6PR13MB2301.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (52.135.93.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2644.10; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 15:24:23 +0000
Received: from SN6PR13MB2271.namprd13.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::70b0:78f1:a9bf:4b64]) by SN6PR13MB2271.namprd13.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::70b0:78f1:a9bf:4b64%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2644.015; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 15:24:23 +0000
From: Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@futurewei.com>
To: Yimin Shen <yshen@juniper.net>, "draft-hu-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection@ietf.org" <draft-hu-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection@ietf.org>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Mail regarding draft-hu-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection
Thread-Topic: Mail regarding draft-hu-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection
Thread-Index: AQHVy9ksQiG/U6AcPUqlM8La4y6P26ftaU61
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 15:24:23 +0000
Message-ID: <SN6PR13MB2271B90EA5807F48073F2C49F2360@SN6PR13MB2271.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
References: <AE1BCB69-6913-46B9-9250-1AC829665B7F@contoso.com>
In-Reply-To: <AE1BCB69-6913-46B9-9250-1AC829665B7F@contoso.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_9784d817-3396-4a4f-b60c-3ef6b345fe55_Enabled=true; MSIP_Label_9784d817-3396-4a4f-b60c-3ef6b345fe55_Name=Juniper Business Use Only; MSIP_Label_9784d817-3396-4a4f-b60c-3ef6b345fe55_Enabled=true; MSIP_Label_9784d817-3396-4a4f-b60c-3ef6b345fe55_SiteId=bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4; MSIP_Label_9784d817-3396-4a4f-b60c-3ef6b345fe55_ContentBits=0; MSIP_Label_9784d817-3396-4a4f-b60c-3ef6b345fe55_Method=Standard; MSIP_Label_9784d817-3396-4a4f-b60c-3ef6b345fe55_ActionId=78337eac-a6d4-4af6-a74c-00004b75ac4a; MSIP_Label_9784d817-3396-4a4f-b60c-3ef6b345fe55_SetDate=2020-01-15T19:06:47Z;
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=huaimo.chen@futurewei.com;
x-originating-ip: [12.111.81.95]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 3d7174e9-0b8c-48fe-7377-08d79a982a52
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SN6PR13MB2301:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <SN6PR13MB2301788C02F0A837D74D3295F2360@SN6PR13MB2301.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 02843AA9E0
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(4636009)(376002)(366004)(136003)(346002)(396003)(39840400004)(189003)(199004)(26005)(186003)(44832011)(71200400001)(7696005)(9686003)(53546011)(52536014)(6506007)(55016002)(81166006)(81156014)(8676002)(66946007)(66446008)(64756008)(66556008)(86362001)(66476007)(33656002)(76116006)(2906002)(478600001)(316002)(110136005)(5660300002)(19627405001)(8936002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:SN6PR13MB2301; H:SN6PR13MB2271.namprd13.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: futurewei.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: atZfjo1wjNIKUTnrU+URtJYl7KYaGXuuggwFCFL4vRU3frcqGrIqVHmQtj3LHbbz+04EE8JJkG9nkXkCW/ghC7joi/zoqnzgpPL+J44B0pO0+LjFyjo6QoVjHeUlcrDv6S4bUVGQ5BYI+sD2p44YByykI+HxiXqLwwBE8MEGzsAVKkWec8G+byIuJ6W0FLcZAhz2gw8qnYxrErEEy0pbWhHKCmEshM+n0226IX4TTl8ZnCdDI3kMmQmmuYaZa8x5RmspTbMMDUbqtkYCWOA+GwfpD+8oTo7F9U5P40QuGfSX+9d9uJYnTrOrwfz2XLHzANzOct+StGT9bLoR5yACOe0PgZnN6t2pEul37IONYj5H5mGZPBLgOeCyGWRl1SCorAswNOmnYUH+8l7C2DOYVtCY1Jn6q+4mBve8zYICSpTExRrUM0iRSVf0gFFQ6Tqo
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_SN6PR13MB2271B90EA5807F48073F2C49F2360SN6PR13MB2271namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: Futurewei.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 3d7174e9-0b8c-48fe-7377-08d79a982a52
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 Jan 2020 15:24:23.0378 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 0fee8ff2-a3b2-4018-9c75-3a1d5591fedc
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: PLrQ98CZ/qAp/fENLg477ky9qbwJN0jK+cuabOSD5UCjXNXWVa+yLvrd+MubsqMEtumRx9Y9MJbxA2dKbqZumw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN6PR13MB2301
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/l31y_j8zPoaIG1eJrKQzY4Sre2M>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 15:24:31 -0000

Hi Yimin,

    Thank you very much for your suggestions/comments.
    I will add reference RFC 8679 with some texts into the draft.

Best Regards,
Huaimo
________________________________
From: Yimin Shen <yshen@juniper.net>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 2:22 PM
To: draft-hu-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection@ietf.org <draft-hu-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection@ietf.org>; rtgwg@ietf.org <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Mail regarding draft-hu-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection


Hi authors,



I’d like to suggest this draft to reference RFC 8679.



In particular, RFC 8679 as a generic EP framework with a lot of general discussions (see the points below), which are applicable to both MPLS and IPv6 data plane, and all types of transport tunnels. However, this draft seems to have almost no consideration or discussion on these topics. I don’t think the draft needs to repeat these discussions, but I suggest to add a section(s) to discuss these points generally by referencing RFC 8679.



  *   general scope and requirements
  *   transport layer failure/protection vs. service layer failure/protection
  *   applicability
  *   failure detection mechanisms
  *   egress node protection
  *   egress link protection
  *   relationship between EP and global repair
  *   co-existing of different types of transport tunnels and bypass tunnels
  *   security





Thanks,



-- Yimin Shen

Juniper Networks