Need presentation slot in RTGwg at IETF100

Linda Dunbar <> Fri, 03 November 2017 03:25 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7542013FB30 for <>; Thu, 2 Nov 2017 20:25:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.219
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.219 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ofh31ilzodK6 for <>; Thu, 2 Nov 2017 20:25:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3951313FB3F for <>; Thu, 2 Nov 2017 20:25:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (EHLO ([]) by (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DZD66520; Fri, 03 Nov 2017 03:25:47 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 03:25:46 +0000
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Thu, 2 Nov 2017 20:25:29 -0700
From: Linda Dunbar <>
To: Jeff Tantsura <>, "" <>
CC: "" <>, Andrew Malis <>
Subject: Need presentation slot in RTGwg at IETF100
Thread-Topic: Need presentation slot in RTGwg at IETF100
Thread-Index: AdNUU1syA+rsMVfTQRSgjWTdxR5IOg==
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 03:25:28 +0000
Message-ID: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66AFC9852sjceml521mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A0B0203.59FBE1BB.008F, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: d04bcbc744f0a2be8ba8734b48a9c055
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 03:25:51 -0000

Jeff and Chris,

Can you give us 15 ~20 minutes time to present VPN Extension to Dynamic Cloud DC?
Here are some of the reasons we propose the topic:
We want to bring general awareness of problems and use cases that have been discussed by ONUG (Open Network User Group) community. I have been participating in ONUG (Open Network User Group) discussion for over a year. (p.s. SD-WAN was conceived in ONUG about 4 years ago). ONUG is enterprises (users) driven community, focusing on their highly desired use cases and problems they face in the digital transformation. Today, one of the hot topic in ONUG is about Enterprises wanting to move workloads to cloud.
We also summarize some of the gaps of the enterprises utilizing abundant Cloud DC (i.e. 3rd party DC that hosts workloads from different users) resources in the process of embracing digital transformation.
Even though not all use cases and problems can be directly translated to IETF solvable problems, many of them are worthwhile to bring to IETF attention, especially from routing area.
We tried to put together drafts to describe the problems and gaps for enterprises to connect their workloads in 3rd party cloud DC, but the drafts alone don't have the original use cases (voted by enterprises participating in ONUG), or may not stimulate in-depth discussion.