IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Thu, 27 April 2017 14:05 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A76E612941C for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 07:05:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.881
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.881 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id De5nJilSzQWn for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 07:05:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 943BB12704B for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 07:05:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Orochi.local (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v3RE5XBu090460 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 27 Apr 2017 09:05:34 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be Orochi.local
Subject: Re: Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Cc: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>, Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, "rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org" <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain@ietf.org, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
References: <149322447211.30122.5870367500760951821.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <f366eb05-b82c-123e-d0ca-8701fe16a469@nostrum.com> <CAHbuEH5vDjZ5tSt=314Dquju7N26XSOqQPNjV=jO6D8Xn7QVdQ@mail.gmail.com> <89d1c702-7830-1f5a-1176-0b894e2d99e9@nostrum.com> <CAHbuEH5OX-GiwF7zqWmks5k6yLj5SXvXwYVFjCChrsa_ckokwQ@mail.gmail.com> <f6ac64b0-1e50-b02f-7043-8cae2cd56020@nostrum.com> <CAHbuEH7B=bzknZnfF_qsE435peOOd8XYjd=YKREeXw0RW18aGA@mail.gmail.com> <0c744357-0d94-62a8-c16b-81a02ef5db45@nostrum.com> <CAG4d1reMAu0YmTfPnStYFx1DotDpwnuGP3BM8ks5-YA1XxrKtA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <d4fa3596-8ff5-5d31-41c3-10e189d553b0@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 09:05:28 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAG4d1reMAu0YmTfPnStYFx1DotDpwnuGP3BM8ks5-YA1XxrKtA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/mGqrxUZlo13MBfp5VUTqI8EMXss>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 14:05:37 -0000

On 4/26/17 23:02, Alia Atlas wrote:
> First, the YANG model is primarily for information in motion - either 
> for configuration to the device
> or to read from the device.   It is much less likely to represent the 
> data structure and storage in the device.
> I believe that this draft's context is strictly for information in motion.


Thanks; I understand all that. I'm trying to focus on the final 
paragraph of section 5, though, which appears to be an exception to what 
you say above.

/a

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email