Re: [Lsr] [OPSAWG] [GROW] FW: New Version Notification for draft-gu-network-mornitoring-protol-00.txt

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Fri, 06 July 2018 13:27 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D6D3130E88; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 06:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5Zwl1g1E_vec; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 06:27:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EBA2130F1F; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 06:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1126; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1530883622; x=1532093222; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=0WWoFIeW0QjG3LiwmyF/k94PrrzikWGzaxl+yGHesfU=; b=F3b8xNeA9fitU/dbKz8z1WNZAqd4CPiUefCRsM3cxQndQUwmEImv7acw LQmIFVGG+3aC0yRUrFD1VmFlm/ZBUUUS3ZJhGJcTeGHsPbr7BDAByolir w1qMJHTp/7oQTwkHbnTO3t3uOWVAITtZoIeoufE2mGM916GDkpxA2PsJ1 o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0B6BQDM+T5b/5tdJa1cGQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQcBAQEBAYNJYn8oCoNwlDmBZSKDOJNyCxgLhEkCF4IWITgUAQIBAQI?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQJtHAyFNgEBAQECAQEBIRE6CQIFCwIBCBgCAh8HAgICJQsVEAIEDgWDIAG?= =?us-ascii?q?BdwgPqRWCHIhPgTUFgQuHYoIVgQ8nDIJcgxgBAYFggwExgiQCmU8JAo8gjVi?= =?us-ascii?q?RZAIREwGBJDQhgVJwFTsqAYI+gkyISIU+b444gRoBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,316,1526342400"; d="scan'208";a="423276414"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Jul 2018 13:27:01 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (xch-rtp-011.cisco.com [64.101.220.151]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w66DR1bw021781 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 6 Jul 2018 13:27:01 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (64.101.220.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 09:27:00 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 09:27:00 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
CC: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, "GMO Crops" <grow@ietf.org>, Robin Li <lizhenbin@huawei.com>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>, Routing WG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] [OPSAWG] [GROW] FW: New Version Notification for draft-gu-network-mornitoring-protol-00.txt
Thread-Topic: [Lsr] [OPSAWG] [GROW] FW: New Version Notification for draft-gu-network-mornitoring-protol-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHUFQxJi2/p2VtYZ0ie8WhKgBdAnaSCa0YAgAAHuQA=
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 13:27:00 +0000
Message-ID: <9EB5B975-6BF5-4274-8AC3-56E5CB3BB92B@cisco.com>
References: <E793174E-A65C-4E8D-89D7-DC602C5494E8@cisco.com> <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D8F43F070@dggemm512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <35FD4375-DF78-4E5B-A1A4-ACCC332A8E5E@cisco.com> <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D8F43FE26@dggemm512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <m2y3ep9q4z.wl-randy@psg.com> <CA+b+ER=1u=nyQ3edrqbyQ_8tuHWtynGoW==BWOEAV_1imTgJPQ@mail.gmail.com> <m2o9fka5at.wl-randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2o9fka5at.wl-randy@psg.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.206]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <6F0D91CD92DCCC409A2C83F2BE9F689D@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/mJ2TlmuZs_slqKYbDN0aabf57GA>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2018 13:27:05 -0000


> On Jul 6, 2018, at 8:59 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
> 
>> ​Why anyone would need BMP wrapper to monitor IGP ?
> 
> probably similar reasons that folk seem to need bgp-ls to get the
> is-is/ospf databases.  is-is and ospf have decades of complexity
> layered on un-simple bases.  so we seek yet another layer of gunk
> through which to see them more 'simply.'
> 
> i would say an optimistic view might be that it will take a couple
> more decades to gunk up bgp-ls and bmp so that we want yet another
> layer.  but it would appear that my optimism is not warranted.


Those who forget the past are condemned to repeat it…

Acee



> 
> randy
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr