Fw: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-02.txt

Pushpasis Sarkar <psarkar@juniper.net> Mon, 15 June 2015 12:09 UTC

Return-Path: <psarkar@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E601B2C33 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 05:09:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id koAzWft0qpCs for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 05:09:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0111.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E12A1B2C32 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 05:09:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLUPR05MB1969.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.162.224.23) by BLUPR05MB1970.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.162.224.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.190.14; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 12:09:09 +0000
Received: from BLUPR05MB1969.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.224.23]) by BLUPR05MB1969.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.224.23]) with mapi id 15.01.0190.013; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 12:09:09 +0000
From: Pushpasis Sarkar <psarkar@juniper.net>
To: "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Fw: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-02.txt
Thread-Topic: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-02.txt
Thread-Index: AQHQp2QVxaHplXVKLUGn0NV3qBphig==
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 12:09:09 +0000
Message-ID: <D1A4BDE1.2921F%psarkar@juniper.net>
References: <20150615120359.13414.61321.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150615120359.13414.61321.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.0.150423
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [116.197.184.14]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BLUPR05MB1970; 3:Ik8HiJPVNJgTwY2u2re89BO5FzqC7dlFdG33//hZWWuKKPj6Z7FaiZMTAdQyd3Yupa688eWF6B8EZPVWCiRbjrpvrnv+blxKG3qnAnMqz9YyzP495Z5ao4KPOevfaKH5TW/kMaDFwtqAD1aNXil1gw==; 10:cV1aNROTz/V46vdeD79zKmP67VvMhvbpDWitCbqXmTvdkM2z0TiHsTQKfTJS89OtG/pec4KKHz+9s7Ml5XC9d/pUXEcKq64zOdkNsl8mDCw=; 6:Fm/Xpalgi6NybFZ7k17oO2ka+5sfLxgVcvZ5VQdmXGKz6DTd+nLQSiGZVC6UTim3
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR05MB1970;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BLUPR05MB1970BE1796C028AEE5FE11A5BCB80@BLUPR05MB1970.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(520003)(5005006)(3002001); SRVR:BLUPR05MB1970; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR05MB1970;
x-forefront-prvs: 0608DEDB67
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(377454003)(24454002)(53754006)(377424004)(479174004)(54356999)(46102003)(86362001)(62966003)(77156002)(4001350100001)(450100001)(2950100001)(36756003)(5002640100001)(19580405001)(19580395003)(122556002)(15975445007)(99286002)(40100003)(106116001)(102836002)(230783001)(76176999)(83506001)(87936001)(2656002)(2351001)(5001920100001)(110136002)(107886002)(5001960100002)(77096005)(50986999)(189998001)(2501003)(92566002)(66066001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR05MB1970; H:BLUPR05MB1969.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <AB71A8CE09898D4F8D3AF2B3AEA59EE9@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 15 Jun 2015 12:09:09.7359 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR05MB1970
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/mhEQREGarh_MhMjhGvSHesvUaQ4>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 12:09:13 -0000

Hi All,

Just bumped up the version number to prevent expiration. No comments
received since last revision.

Thanks
-Pushpasis

On 6/15/15, 5:33 PM, "internet-drafts@ietf.org" <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
wrote:

>
>A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Routing Area Working Group Working
>Group of the IETF.
>
>        Title           : Remote-LFA Node Protection and Manageability
>        Authors         : Pushpasis Sarkar
>                          Hannes Gredler
>                          Shraddha Hegde
>                          Chris Bowers
>                          Stephane Litkowski
>                          Harish Raghuveer
>	Filename        : draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-02.txt
>	Pages           : 16
>	Date            : 2015-06-15
>
>Abstract:
>   The loop-free alternates computed following the current Remote-LFA
>   [I-D.ietf-rtgwg-remote-lfa] specification gaurantees only link-
>   protection.  The resulting Remote-LFA nexthops (also called PQ-
>   nodes), may not gaurantee node-protection for all destinations being
>   protected by it.
>
>   This document describes procedures for determining if a given PQ-node
>   provides node-protection for a specific destination or not.  The
>   document also shows how the same procedure can be utilised for
>   collection of complete characteristics for alternate paths.
>   Knowledge about the characteristics of all alternate path is
>   precursory to apply operator defined policy for eliminating paths not
>   fitting constraints.
>
>
>
>The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection/
>
>There's also a htmlized version available at:
>https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-02
>
>A diff from the previous version is available at:
>https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-02
>
>
>Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>submission
>until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
>Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
>_______________________________________________
>rtgwg mailing list
>rtgwg@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg