Subject: [rtgwg] RFC 8347 BIS - "A YANG Data Model for the Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP)"
From: Acee Lindem <[email-masked]>
To: Mohamed Boucadair <[email-masked]>, Renato Westphal <[email-masked]>
Cc: RTGWG <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 16:21:34 -0400
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>

Hi Mohamed, Renato,

Would it be possible to get a review of this BIS version of the VRRP YANG model? The main impetus of the BIS was to remove the non-inclusive language. 
However, we have the opportunity to make other changes including adding more operational state. I think it would be good to address the substantive
YANG comments prior to the IESG Telechat for a change. 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-vrrp-rfc8347bis/

Note that we agreed to remove the deprecated data nodes so that the non-inclusive language is removed in one RFC iteration as opposed to three.
To date, no one has implemented the existing ietf-vrrp.yang model with the data-nodes that cannot be named, so that plan is to leave them
or of the BIS version. 

Thanks,
Acee