Re: Request for WG adoption - draft-ding-rtgwg-arp-yang-model

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Thu, 26 July 2018 01:46 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53387130F2D; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 18:46:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.509
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.509 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6tQXlqj_Jokx; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 18:45:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76B88130F23; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 18:45:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10122; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1532569558; x=1533779158; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=D/6dR+/RyNtsG9K1dncbM3YqDFK3pNN6AveXbN5iVWg=; b=WaajPaEI42Te5mS0EKUZw7j+Ll2XGOwzvkDMGozDJR2ddSd7PaVO6l5G ClXuAdRApmL0TVjYpxLWL5ZKPraG4D+XtWgwxzDAOUEBG+jP8M5MsxyDK LxPhvc0jwLwdlNUjjnRkWAmd6pDw7YWsvrac9gxybi2IiZHiEUFMU5ReS c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CcAQBzJ1lb/51dJa1cGQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQcBAQEBAYJXdmN/KAqDdJRCgWgkiD+HdYUVFIFmC4RsAheCTyE2FgE?= =?us-ascii?q?CAQECAQECbSiFNgEBAQQjSwYFEAIBCBEDAQIrAgICHxEdCAIEAQ0FgyABgRt?= =?us-ascii?q?MAxWxQIEuhxcNgyaJAheCAIE4DBOCTIEoGQGBFIFvBQESAT+CYTGCJAKIWok?= =?us-ascii?q?mh0orCQKMJ4MMgUaEGYggPopehmoCERSBJCQHKmFxcBU7KgGCPgmCKI4ib4w?= =?us-ascii?q?wgR+BGwEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,403,1526342400"; d="scan'208,217";a="432211847"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Jul 2018 01:45:57 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (xch-rtp-012.cisco.com [64.101.220.152]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w6Q1jvlr019412 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 26 Jul 2018 01:45:57 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (64.101.220.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 21:45:56 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 21:45:56 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
CC: rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ding-rtgwg-arp-yang-model@ietf.org" <draft-ding-rtgwg-arp-yang-model@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Request for WG adoption - draft-ding-rtgwg-arp-yang-model
Thread-Topic: Request for WG adoption - draft-ding-rtgwg-arp-yang-model
Thread-Index: AQHUJHyrX8g9bmLhrk6RgG7iQuhcEqSgu8+A
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 01:45:56 +0000
Message-ID: <A5E1A756-F3DF-4565-993F-29D9982610BD@cisco.com>
References: <1ACE6CBB-98FF-4C3A-B169-F1AEC900AF8E@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1ACE6CBB-98FF-4C3A-B169-F1AEC900AF8E@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.201]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A5E1A756F3DF4565993F29D9982610BDciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 64.101.220.152, xch-rtp-012.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-6.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/n4-xwhU-clECqAMYlXe7GpekY9w>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 01:46:02 -0000

Hi Jeff,
I support WG adoption.
Thanks,
Acee

From: rtgwg <rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org>; on behalf of Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>;
Date: Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 9:04 PM
To: Routing WG <rtgwg@ietf.org>;
Cc: rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>;, "draft-ding-rtgwg-arp-yang-model@ietf.org"; <draft-ding-rtgwg-arp-yang-model@ietf.org>;
Subject: Request for WG adoption - draft-ding-rtgwg-arp-yang-model

Dear RTGWG,

The authors have requested the RTGWG to adopt draft-ding-rtgwg-arp-yang-model as the working group document.
The draft has been stable and provides all the additional arp pieces that are not in RFC8344, it has been presented at IETF 102 and no substantial comments have been received.

Please indicate support or no-support by August 09, 2018

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this
email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.
The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will not
advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each
author and each individual that has contributed to the document.

Cheers,
Jeff & Chris