IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-12

Pushpasis Sarkar <pushpasis.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 20 January 2017 11:33 UTC

Return-Path: <pushpasis.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08CED129B2D; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 03:33:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S9f-YZiFpn4q; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 03:33:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-x231.google.com (mail-yw0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 397B112983F; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 03:33:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw0-x231.google.com with SMTP id u68so43311308ywg.0; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 03:33:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fu4iFzVKNbX//i65hN9a0XqRPPTt7vjvwAscdGoTYBc=; b=K4v4NhRWi6CmQKRgLbuWO2vvDlEIqiqVI3WErz7iBaQ6YigS6SDSs89Ofp4x6muSJe nWw289pNFBKG1nnDiwPB0TdXEGpMJUvhtuFMixZvyPz+1jP1kXe/lHoqoyatqrhnMDWP UnKB8tZS2Qw+shn2tC/kS/e+R0qJ85EZd7shSXMIaCqrL+g1eevJgDKlj53DMLyBsR1u J4oUQgUBx30oV/sxise/CRe4vsaDmU9lXOSCAJa/uAybudKtF9sMCC2zJ8F84SSuR76C Chq5EM87wjAgJaBo7qrjHPJKFVeNRgn8cmn/diqc1rRfvxm5tqAUZOKqO7XI31vK2GCT QE5g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fu4iFzVKNbX//i65hN9a0XqRPPTt7vjvwAscdGoTYBc=; b=PafzmvVldzbDr6kCqoGbjqxLd9CpVmEq3foI6GaM3mRPoGbzDe1m741GdBmR4BKxQB 1g4Cigg6LE50t1OxW8bVEeSTP0HKy7qlnvXuiTRgI/n3yhk08bGbafZdcOqdiKWklhTU s4LJOvPNTF5BhY6+Hc8MpyljzzBcUrK7O659cxETvnHaQ3T7Vp+TxN6XfzmQcie4bVHu opCCb87D5xAOAwTtBxTfO9lTIWtIvAUb6HFZs865zbaBxbmD5B2AnarYip7CcpsrViIA i9jKf901by6vutVj4w4lpnf+W0suc75UAouHp5QygSJke0y2B9SrOY4Lrlui974ggd+f 5Amg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLJMblNEyBjksuQT8WzAcFvzIiRE6GLSs0EioDTJpDgp0zQZU7sMC2n2hJNeyMhIB32tE2HfUAqF5G6VQ==
X-Received: by 10.13.197.71 with SMTP id h68mr8961163ywd.127.1484911991453; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 03:33:11 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.197.138 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 03:33:11 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <148491117842.13408.17620284540820285490.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <148491117842.13408.17620284540820285490.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Pushpasis Sarkar <pushpasis.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 17:03:11 +0530
Message-ID: <CAEFuwkhUfuwefwoN78fWbVe7Y8ZxeM3jrBHye1VhLUP6ijhZ1g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-12
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114e62fcc61f4b05468503cb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/ne_EOar5xeCnji0wijZUrPVhXis>
Cc: rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 11:33:14 -0000

Hi Benoit,

I am sorry to say that I have accidentally changed some text in Abstract in
version 12. I have uploaded another version 13 reversing back the changes
but trying to avoid a NIT that was flagging.. So request you to approve
version 13 as well..

Once again I regret the inconvenience caused..

Thanks and regards,
-Pushpasis


On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote:

> Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-12: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection/
>
>
> There are no remarks associated with this position.
>
>
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email