RE: WG adoption poll for draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa

<stephane.litkowski@orange.com> Thu, 09 August 2018 14:59 UTC

Return-Path: <stephane.litkowski@orange.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D14B2130FE6 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Aug 2018 07:59:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TtJ6DHqxeNpR for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Aug 2018 07:59:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from orange.com (mta239.mail.business.static.orange.com [80.12.66.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D636130FD7 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Aug 2018 07:58:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfedar06.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.8]) by opfedar22.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 41mWby0jB7z30wW; Thu, 9 Aug 2018 16:58:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.31.18]) by opfedar06.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 41mWbx6wTMz3wbh; Thu, 9 Aug 2018 16:58:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::65de:2f08:41e6:ebbe]) by OPEXCLILM34.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::cba:56d0:a732:ef5a%19]) with mapi id 14.03.0408.000; Thu, 9 Aug 2018 16:58:53 +0200
From: stephane.litkowski@orange.com
To: Chris Bowers <cbowers@juniper.net>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: WG adoption poll for draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa
Thread-Topic: WG adoption poll for draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa
Thread-Index: AdQv7Sg0rqIO3h7GSzuu+qgjlwZNiQABD/ZQ
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2018 14:58:53 +0000
Message-ID: <10987_1533826734_5B6C56AE_10987_421_1_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF924B26D993@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <SN6PR05MB44300874E544A6CD494D291CA9250@SN6PR05MB4430.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <SN6PR05MB44300874E544A6CD494D291CA9250@SN6PR05MB4430.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.4]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF924B26D993OPEXCLILMA4corp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/nhmZD8lG4dv0wvJ7KnYuTujaD6Q>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2018 14:59:13 -0000

Support as co-author.
I'm not aware of any IPR except the one already disclosed.


From: rtgwg [mailto:rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Chris Bowers
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2018 16:30
To: rtgwg@ietf.org
Subject: WG adoption poll for draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa

RTGWG,

Jeff and I think it makes sense to adopt draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa
as a working group document.

There has been a lot of useful discussion about this draft on the list..  However, the text of the
draft has not been modified to reflect a good deal of valid feedback from reviewers.
We intend to address this issue if and when the draft becomes a working group document.

Please indicate your support or opposition to the adoption of this draft.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to this email stating
whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.   The response needs to be sent to the
RTGWG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has
been received from each author and each individual that has contributed to the document.

At this point, the document has the following IPR disclosure associated with it.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3068/

This adoption poll will end on August 24th.

Thanks,
Chris and Jeff



_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.