AD review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model-06

Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Wed, 17 January 2018 18:10 UTC

Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0217912E059; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 10:10:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gRwC8e2Ol2ZV; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 10:10:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot0-x22a.google.com (mail-ot0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7266712E852; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 10:10:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id x4so1981621otg.7; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 10:10:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=QmwUw/RaBivtQ5Ye5PgMxXC7fikesh5HPs+qp8OyCwk=; b=F9hDKfbo0uQRreo5rrDKh0kLmTMZJatQpc34OqgcYzYl8oCL80sxq+YimUohTwHsgK mEzWCOgWBj3epbFRk0nuUjZe9giIHSrlI4CNabya0f2txvMfiMsWJ9UQ2Jk4ahi6llxG 5JT2MN7VceIKAC7VhRjdcAc01Y89b/eVIe77tBfA9x06HuSyPrcw7RvLiq5JsflPGxTA VQgbutEeMjA2OzD0nuPrEdQrjHdSuEH/IWzX4K8VurhiOtbU5d5D8cm8dJQQR1+dMKrc sZCimZScBP1A/uM3iGT266oA2AqJnkQcaaR8c96RpSsG2kV2VgSkGTx2Cgkm1QkosjFG G4sA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=QmwUw/RaBivtQ5Ye5PgMxXC7fikesh5HPs+qp8OyCwk=; b=qV9pDlUkUTg3HbOgM94xoRtfpMUwMS11kgM4C2aMWAzX3h8n+CjwJ+ET35dsTWzQQA rNB435oWEjzZ2H/88yoBNOnMYcH0xVQ2ChERgoqNulTVgAHgzZ6pykexkYQi3Jr3tY7J 43ansIaibR534aEQnKG7TeF8FTQEAbrqii58gn42YEFHlIq9vZmCjAHDjRgXq41he98I cgd5gtswc3W3Ul51CUMwmxtnszslJBI27iiSJLajLdI4kLra89siy/27HjD/dpfe8BkT lJXkdbOWiVN1+o5ppB5gefCd20TyBOebLrnEWM5eVGk0jPN7/JyHInseX2+WhF0PPrCV U8UA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytfVvrroPlumAt490IBveeNCvCBwl/iosTv+NQv0k02vom8OqQDn zk+m77V+skR30zWEVoPuprfRYAsc01LJooVcQoZOUTQ2
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBovTk5jCBe80e7u1LGFJzli+e/yJKFWu2YtnR0Tkgu/Jm0JiYkEhvB5mClBtMaJP+u7Cfu0sithPxMywA9CWjDg=
X-Received: by 10.157.9.208 with SMTP id 16mr1600787otz.96.1516212605186; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 10:10:05 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.67.47 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 10:10:04 -0800 (PST)
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 13:10:04 -0500
Message-ID: <CAG4d1rePDkwAQc0rc=mQLA3-y+0nwACRV6xbockmh2ggnumeTA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: AD review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model-06
To: "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11417f24bc79760562fcc1cf"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/o52xCidaZVtACIL4biOKY8HKcoc>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 18:10:11 -0000

As is customary, I have done my AD review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model-06.
First, I would like to thank the authors - Lou, Chris, Acee, and Dean - and
those who have reviewed it for their work on this core document.

I am requesting IETF Last Call and have placed this on the IESG telechat
for Feb 8.

I do have a few minor points below that should be fixed.

Minor:

1) Sec 3.1.2:  This example uses rt:routing-state and rt:routing in a
pre-NMDA fashion.

2) Reference to RFC 7223 should be to draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bi
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis/>s.
References to RFC 7277 should be to draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis.

3) Revision dates in example schema mount in Sec 3.3 have dates for old
versions instead of the bis drafts.

Regardsd,
Alia