IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Requesting slot in RTGwg to present

Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com> Tue, 03 July 2018 20:29 UTC

Return-Path: <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8288130DD5 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 13:29:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I1pnu3NzI60N for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 13:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31B23124BE5 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 13:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 0BDB7CE0609F2 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 21:29:00 +0100 (IST)
Received: from SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.208.112.40) by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.382.0; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 21:29:01 +0100
Received: from SJCEML521-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.90]) by SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.186]) with mapi id 14.03.0382.000; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 13:29:00 -0700
From: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, Chris Bowers <chrisbowers.ietf@gmail.com>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
CC: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>, "Mehmet Toy (mehmet.toy@verizon.com)" <mehmet.toy@verizon.com>, "christian.jacquenet@orange.com" <christian.jacquenet@orange.com>
Subject: RE: Requesting slot in RTGwg to present
Thread-Topic: Requesting slot in RTGwg to present
Thread-Index: AdQS+fFxueLo73dESnmoL3eIkWtO2QATFiCAAA550PA=
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2018 20:28:59 +0000
Message-ID: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B07D5A7@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B07D4D8@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com> <793D415B-29C7-4008-A496-ED6AC359F284@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <793D415B-29C7-4008-A496-ED6AC359F284@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.192.11.89]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B07D5A7sjceml521mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/o6k-NPv7NCkWXuBGWmUPCkw5zDo>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2018 20:29:07 -0000

Jeff,

Thank you for giving the opportunity.

Thurs RTGwg is preferred.

Linda

From: Jeff Tantsura [mailto:jefftant.ietf@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2018 3:23 PM
To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>; Chris Bowers <chrisbowers.ietf@gmail.com>; rtgwg@ietf.org
Cc: Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@gmail.com>; Mehmet Toy (mehmet.toy@verizon.com) <mehmet.toy@verizon.com>; christian.jacquenet@orange.com
Subject: Re: Requesting slot in RTGwg to present

Hi Linda,

Noted, thanks.
2 questions:
1. I recall you had a preference for a particular day, please let me know which days it  is.
2. I think you’d need more time, SD-WAN is a hot topic and we are considering bringing some additional work, please let me know.

Thanks!

Cheers,
Jeff

From: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com<mailto:linda.dunbar@huawei.com>>
Date: Tuesday, July 3, 2018 at 11:22
To: Chris Bowers <chrisbowers.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:chrisbowers.ietf@gmail.com>>, Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>>, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>>
Cc: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com<mailto:agmalis@gmail.com>>, "Mehmet Toy (mehmet.toy@verizon.com<mailto:mehmet.toy@verizon.com>)" <mehmet.toy@verizon.com<mailto:mehmet.toy@verizon.com>>, "christian.jacquenet@orange.com<mailto:christian.jacquenet@orange.com>" <christian.jacquenet@orange.com<mailto:christian.jacquenet@orange.com>>
Subject: Requesting slot in RTGwg to present

Chris and Jeff,

We would like a 10-minutes slot in the upcoming IETF 102 RTGwg session to discuss the technological gaps when using SD-WAN to interconnect workloads & apps hosted in various locations, especially cloud data centers when the network service providers do not have or have limited physical infrastructure to reach the locations.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dm-net2cloud-gap-analysis/

Presenter: Linda Dunbar.

We have made significant changes to the gap analysis since IETF101. Therefore we think it is worthwhile to have a face to face discussion in RTGwg in IETF102.

Thank you very much.

Linda

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email