Re: WG adoption poll for draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa
Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Thu, 09 August 2018 14:33 UTC
Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 708AA130E33 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Aug 2018 07:33:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h9odR1ADQXI5 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Aug 2018 07:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-f177.google.com (mail-pf1-f177.google.com [209.85.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29039130EA3 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Aug 2018 07:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-f177.google.com with SMTP id e13-v6so2936406pff.7 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 07:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wXy6EhsdPHWWltHplh8lh7Kne4NebCbuGyyCc0zESGw=; b=ILLu+m3Wisp5B6b0YYMI3zlLxO6O0dSUF3PsLV1KTa56eDS1X6PKxE5soaqXcK0s7Z ciOWUqboT9brBm2Nr4TA/eqxkB2F5UPbR3PV1hk5UtrSs8PC8nJ4Z6lcLKmxOSF7lshL Nz+BaIyic4yJJeGSaj+8ty3L09acGUKuP9tNnIwyBN5HZ37HCdHHZrwSG4AAioYPxcm+ 2fHTg8ekM5RxyuLSlTV2ZIhVYre++Q6iyzy4H1ediJDggiVnACyiBHjIUJCCiz5ngSi2 ypGuA+gOJSX2AErLclrjq4hkXoPkkfqs3cAA2CWUWT6sWF29OW2z2sY1PsmAFs9/+r2h fPlw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlGfeimRt36n6/HIWsx+2LunAMWvwgXEjkCBdXyHAmmoOeLa+kQY Y8ZkF6NgWakfxg4AlYd+nAqLGbTawx6nowPquAmg2oSP
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPx2rRFTxILLiZBmu8A1V3p7Gkzn+76dT/My0MlwHMe1smeGxoOP6kyu5P+CKTNYxnWJW+756x+W4dZZK0/qiGs=
X-Received: by 2002:a65:498c:: with SMTP id r12-v6mr2496465pgs.112.1533825233429; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 07:33:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <SN6PR05MB44300874E544A6CD494D291CA9250@SN6PR05MB4430.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <SN6PR05MB44300874E544A6CD494D291CA9250@SN6PR05MB4430.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2018 16:33:42 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+b+ERnTEf-0p26CdLefbDL5mtUrgWs142FuFjX1siLouuJLuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: WG adoption poll for draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa
To: Chris Bowers <cbowers@juniper.net>
Cc: RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002faaac0573018434"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/pAUAMoharWLVKPtJU4phL16VFGw>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2018 14:33:57 -0000
I support adoption of this document as a RTGWG item. Thx, Robert. On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 4:30 PM Chris Bowers <cbowers@juniper.net> wrote: > RTGWG, > > Jeff and I think it makes sense to adopt > draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa > as a working group document. > > There has been a lot of useful discussion about this draft on the list.. > However, the text of the > draft has not been modified to reflect a good deal of valid feedback from > reviewers. > We intend to address this issue if and when the draft becomes a working > group document. > > Please indicate your support or opposition to the adoption of this draft. > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to > this email stating > whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The response needs to > be sent to the > RTGWG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until > a response has > been received from each author and each individual that has contributed to > the document. > > At this point, the document has the following IPR disclosure associated > with it. > *https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3068/* > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3068/> > > This adoption poll will end on August 24th. > > Thanks, > Chris and Jeff > > > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > rtgwg@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg >
- WG adoption poll for draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment… Chris Bowers
- Re: WG adoption poll for draft-bashandy-rtgwg-seg… Robert Raszuk
- RE: WG adoption poll for draft-bashandy-rtgwg-seg… stephane.litkowski
- Re: WG adoption poll for draft-bashandy-rtgwg-seg… Acee Lindem (acee)
- RE: WG adoption poll for draft-bashandy-rtgwg-seg… bruno.decraene
- Re: WG adoption poll for draft-bashandy-rtgwg-seg… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [**EXTERNAL**] WG adoption poll for draft-bas… Duncan, Ian
- Re: WG adoption poll for draft-bashandy-rtgwg-seg… Chris Bowers
- Re: WG adoption poll for draft-bashandy-rtgwg-seg… Chris Bowers
- Re: WG adoption poll for draft-bashandy-rtgwg-seg… Pierre François
- Re: WG adoption poll for draft-bashandy-rtgwg-seg… Voyer, Daniel
- Re: WG adoption poll for draft-bashandy-rtgwg-seg… Chris Bowers
- Re: WG adoption poll for draft-bashandy-rtgwg-seg… Ahmed Bashandy
- Re: WG adoption poll for draft-bashandy-rtgwg-seg… Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil)