Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-08: (with COMMENT)

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Thu, 11 January 2018 10:47 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietf.org
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC71126B71; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 02:47:46 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip@ietf.org, Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.qu@huawei.com>, rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org, yingzhen.qu@huawei.com, rtgwg@ietf.org
Subject: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-08: (with COMMENT)
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.68.3
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <151566766624.31882.9935055856776071049.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 02:47:46 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/pEDW_T8EZUCTIGrzzHW26x2EJOw>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 10:47:46 -0000

Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-08: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Looking at the YANG modules dependencies. See
https://www.yangcatalog.org/yang-search/impact_analysis.php?modules[]=ietf-rip@2018-01-09.yang&recurse=0&rfcs=1&show_subm=1&show_dir=dependencies

I would appreciate an update from the RTG ADs on these 3 normative references:

   [I-D.ietf-bfd-yang]
              Rahman, R., Zheng, L., Jethanandani, M., Networks, J., and
              G. Mirsky, "YANG Data Model for Bidirectional Forwarding
              Detection (BFD)", draft-ietf-bfd-yang-07 (work in
              progress), October 2017.

   [I-D.ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg]
              Litkowski, S., Yeung, D., Lindem, A., Zhang, Z., and L.
              Lhotka, "YANG Data Model for IS-IS protocol", draft-ietf-
              isis-yang-isis-cfg-19 (work in progress), November 2017.

   [I-D.ietf-ospf-yang]
              Yeung, D., Qu, Y., Zhang, Z., Chen, I., and A. Lindem,
              "Yang Data Model for OSPF Protocol", draft-ietf-ospf-
              yang-09 (work in progress), October 2017.

Any risk that the content will change and impact the YANG module in
draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip? All other YANG module dependencies are either on
this telechat or the next one (RFC8022bis).