RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-06.txt
Uma Chunduri <uma.chunduri@huawei.com> Thu, 08 February 2018 19:50 UTC
Return-Path: <uma.chunduri@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A21B12D969 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 11:50:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.23
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.23 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yZr-y849aBFb for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 11:50:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA89512D833 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 11:50:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml709-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id EFF452A76C79B for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 19:50:15 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.208.112.40) by lhreml709-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 19:50:17 +0000
Received: from SJCEML521-MBB.china.huawei.com ([169.254.6.91]) by SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.93]) with mapi id 14.03.0382.000; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 11:50:08 -0800
From: Uma Chunduri <uma.chunduri@huawei.com>
To: "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-06.txt
Thread-Topic: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-06.txt
Thread-Index: AQHToRV0HlIPq2n0lEGoRA/rCRkm+KOa6UYQ
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 19:50:08 +0000
Message-ID: <25B4902B1192E84696414485F5726854135403C8@SJCEML521-MBB.china.huawei.com>
References: <151811911333.17196.13132131958334023982@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <151811911333.17196.13132131958334023982@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.209.217.169]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/r-YTKjkUyu5vjpMeBD2F1jEQqn0>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 19:50:22 -0000
Dear All, FYI. No changes to the content after LC completion; except few idnits as pointed during Shepherd write-up and affiliation changes. -- Uma C. -----Original Message----- From: rtgwg [mailto:rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2018 11:45 AM To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Cc: rtgwg@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-06.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Routing Area Working Group WG of the IETF. Title : LFA selection for Multi-Homed Prefixes Authors : Pushpasis Sarkar Shraddha Hegde Uma Chunduri Jeff Tantsura Hannes Gredler Filename : draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-06.txt Pages : 18 Date : 2018-02-08 Abstract: This document shares experience gained from implementing algorithms to determine Loop-Free Alternates for multi-homed prefixes. In particular, this document provides explicit inequalities that can be used to evaluate neighbors as a potential alternates for multi-homed prefixes. It also provides detailed criteria for evaluating potential alternates for external prefixes advertised by OSPF ASBRs. This documents updates and expands some of the "Routing Aspects" as specified in Section 6 of RFC 5286. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-06 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-06 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-06 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lf… internet-drafts
- RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefi… Uma Chunduri