Re: RTGWG WGLC draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Mon, 23 October 2017 21:21 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A94313A41F; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 14:21:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sjfroOXJNOIy; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 14:21:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E09113A41A; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 14:21:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1638; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1508793702; x=1510003302; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=n18cR0Ox5vyBKLKp6hKIvMyzgIZ91C0UPVmr+gsa5uk=; b=UFY98OfN/GEEr9xyQ2jdFcY8paQwVoWPjZYyB+cpgeZ8FV3oGMS6oHWN cx/8HwcBejgFDvcgE0WYpiNsnfNHCKQKdyBEscflPC6nDZZPx3JzJqg4d Ufi4FwVmPO91fK2VVOL7kwzH/WN3bC6MN8qn0PziGNj+ruSgcbwqb8RGX 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0ChAABGXO5Z/4gNJK1bGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBg19kbicHg3OKH49FikWNbhCCAQoYC4UYAhqEOj8YAQIBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BayiFHgIEAQEhEToGBRACAQgaAiYCAgIfBgsVEAIEAQ0FiggDFRCoCIInh0sNg?= =?us-ascii?q?1MBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEYBYEPgh+CB4Zjgl6BbwUBEgEfgxSCYQW?= =?us-ascii?q?hKjwCj3mEeYIVhXqLEo0MiEMCERkBgTgBHziBA1h6FUmCZIRfdol6gSSBEQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?Q?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.43,424,1503360000"; d="scan'208";a="311348166"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 23 Oct 2017 21:21:41 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (xch-rtp-013.cisco.com [64.101.220.153]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v9NLLewW015960 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 23 Oct 2017 21:21:41 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 17:21:40 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 17:21:40 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
CC: Rtg-dt-yang-arch <rtg-dt-yang-arch-bounces@ietf.org>, "'rtgwg-chairs'" <rtgwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: RTGWG WGLC draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model
Thread-Topic: RTGWG WGLC draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model
Thread-Index: AQHTTERSJB8pdVNkoUSsvVj3HFmumKLx8S8A
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 21:21:40 +0000
Message-ID: <D613D574.D12F1%acee@cisco.com>
References: <B08AEDA6-EE43-41D1-B829-CDCDC3C5BF5F@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <B08AEDA6-EE43-41D1-B829-CDCDC3C5BF5F@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.195]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <93482AEA9DC9DE43B58FB827D5236F5D@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/s7LwO2NZ2fbUXYAmfFS5-YWjVaY>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 21:21:44 -0000

As a co-author, I am not aware of any relevant IPR.
Thanks,
acee 

On 10/23/17, 5:17 PM, "rtgwg on behalf of Jeff Tantsura"
<rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>; wrote:

>Dear RTGWG,
>
>The authors have requested the RTGWG to last call
>draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model.
>
>The interdependencies related to draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount have been
>addressed.
>There was consensus that document is ready for the last call during the
>last IETF meeting 
>and the authors have addressed all the comments from Directorate QA
>review and YANGDOCTORS.
>Please indicate support or no-support by November 6, 2017.
>
>IPR:
>If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to
>this 
>email of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.
>The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list.
>The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
>received from each author and each individual that has contributed to the
>document.
>
>Thanks,
>Jeff & Chris
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>rtgwg mailing list
>rtgwg@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg