Re: RTGWG WGLC draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Mon, 23 October 2017 21:34 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77735138351 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 14:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uOyL8yW-Cx5W for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 14:34:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy8-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy8-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.33.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E81C713A415 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 14:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmgw4 (unknown [10.0.90.85]) by gproxy8.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B8621AB043 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 15:34:30 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw4 with id R9aS1w0082SSUrH019aVPL; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 15:34:30 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=JNNLi4Cb c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=02M-m0pO-4AA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=b_WksXNRxVlq5zQGuUoA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:CC:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=PpT282Bq8XmvQKv/DOm9NZXHwBdFacrz+ZuZ61D+D3I=; b=wmZiPKmvymDWCb3C3OKRwAlqE2 y2kgI96HK+JQgSBd51drHop32+LZ/aWQviyYh01MmQWwFeb/A5t8lfFrfHz0b0DVOCiFrhWvpleVL le3TDFRD1xYqyrsmz1v+tRlCO;
Received: from [172.58.185.37] (port=31782 helo=[IPV6:2607:fb90:64b8:413f:0:47:1f1a:2201]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1e6kMb-002jSU-V7; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 15:34:26 -0600
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
CC: "Rtg-dt-yang-arch" <rtg-dt-yang-arch-bounces@ietf.org>, "'rtgwg-chairs'" <rtgwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 17:34:22 -0400
Message-ID: <15f4b286f30.27d3.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <B08AEDA6-EE43-41D1-B829-CDCDC3C5BF5F@gmail.com>
References: <B08AEDA6-EE43-41D1-B829-CDCDC3C5BF5F@gmail.com>
User-Agent: AquaMail/1.11.0-568 (build: 101100004)
Subject: Re: RTGWG WGLC draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 172.58.185.37
X-Exim-ID: 1e6kMb-002jSU-V7
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: ([IPV6:2607:fb90:64b8:413f:0:47:1f1a:2201]) [172.58.185.37]:31782
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 5
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/s8GURPaL-bkElu5S2Y4vP6zdch0>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 21:34:32 -0000

Hi,

I am not aware of any relevant IPR.

Lou
As contributor


On October 23, 2017 5:17:43 PM Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>; wrote:

> Dear RTGWG,
>
> The authors have requested the RTGWG to last call draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model.
>
> The interdependencies related to draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount have been 
> addressed.
> There was consensus that document is ready for the last call during the 
> last IETF meeting
> and the authors have addressed all the comments from Directorate QA review 
> and YANGDOCTORS.
> Please indicate support or no-support by November 6, 2017.
>
> IPR:
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to this
> email of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.
> The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list.
> The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
> received from each author and each individual that has contributed to the 
> document.
>
> Thanks,
> Jeff & Chris
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> rtgwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>