IETF Logo Mail Archive

RTGWG feedback on APN next steps

Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 05 April 2022 17:15 UTC

Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C7643A0CF2; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 10:15:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.007
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.007 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ihx0kxVnJqOv; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 10:15:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42b.google.com (mail-wr1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1A133A0CF1; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 10:14:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id r13so20320777wrr.9; Tue, 05 Apr 2022 10:14:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:date:from:subject:thread-topic:message-id:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1wvjmxV2aWDe3x03bLNavNVbFE4dV2u108RDOMIkNZs=; b=EPFcE6gGL1bA58ntdji2MLYihHKM7yr+yUf4sNzxEnFY/uuB01frrcQNAriNHFgrun ZB7YOa7bJaxCWl1cyHPQS+y6+HsMpMuKhQL/O+k9qKXD7ZCBpxcFtaU20Dm6u/umfVdH WSq0RLxGvlE0BdsLVqDTa8W7dkLOHveVRlxS9Ayu2KmXMK+RC415uXGJPB0ugaGcq9RF EPNdK0evUmmwZbI8ciSj1GCIboYBjJTJXpP+5qVlmzKSPLfO7xZ15mU0feHDXCSwLPvS 981HVm3baszBFSyE9FRJGMbH1pjfX/WnMsVUa02GSdp9sIR2RcnRfwwrsweQzHepOF6J 3vjw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:from:subject:thread-topic :message-id:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1wvjmxV2aWDe3x03bLNavNVbFE4dV2u108RDOMIkNZs=; b=ywtvxy8hfpcPLibMbIAeZWHMpgDCBQ7LCpRm2l8aoQy91cf+tLsON/hOmdumPwtT5r cVdWwLwIkToigOH8WpsoDARYDkCLPFX6x/7hBVitSX4a3gNjkZ2cHuhHDwExxhPx5tGn o+qxKajxF72ZuOCd0CUh1nkzEwhOM1HbQnxbHO4MAu1LXn/7agd4z9zgtM/DkLgkdKJo VsHaYLV9KQUtiBHjWBXMA88GfMxhfMx5HT5udUVJgoKu0dfJGTlHfC44vHIhRVBfqO5T SfN6zmEbl3DpH5G/vmI+U+E+qtgpP8r4rxjbROcbzP3F5KApKaFV1Ee2VN/xR94pppQz p2lw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530SgD5clCBfvEvuJym0osCVfgBj8BlTS0zrIo7hvcdjviy038fG nMFYPvTsAyRoVslw/YBd2EqtPF07B2rFUg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzl6suGBb7+PbsrWAGVb8C0Epw3rHSAFowUyIr2vr06qix2IIRDj7HHWkU0DjLcTNSHCbG8qQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6d07:0:b0:206:de5:c479 with SMTP id e7-20020a5d6d07000000b002060de5c479mr3642233wrq.256.1649178897380; Tue, 05 Apr 2022 10:14:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Jeff-Corp-Win (pcp.vipnetwork.fr. [193.108.21.251]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f11-20020a7bcc0b000000b0037e0c362b6dsm2674490wmh.31.2022.04.05.10.14.56 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Apr 2022 10:14:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 10:14:55 -0700
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps
Thread-Topic: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps
Message-ID: <204D8DE6-F51C-4551-B1D7-1D69DBCA3626@hxcore.ol>
To: RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>, rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, "rtg-ads@ietf.org" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/sC4ngvr4HDnhar13O93MiaxQxlk>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2022 17:15:02 -0000

Dear RTGWG,

 

 

APN has been presented at RTGWG multiple times, and we see the evolution of the

documents, including the scope of the problem and framework.  This topic needs

collaboration across WGs; we can foresee that not all issues to be addressed are

within the charter of RTGWG and would span beyond the Routing area.

 

RTGWG is chartered to provide a venue for new work, there are a couple of different options and one option for handling

such new work would be to recommend the development of a new WG. 

The Chairs would then want to recommend that the ADs consider forming a focus WG, with a set of well defined deliverables and milestones (after delivery the group would be shut down) to work on a framework for APN.

 

We would like to solicit the WG for opinions.  Please note that comments about

existing APN documents should be sent to apn@ietf.org.  This thread focuses on

support or objection to recommending that the ADs consider the formation of a

new WG.

 

Please send your comments, support, or objectiond.

Thanks!

 

 

Cheers,

Yingzhen  Jeff

 

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email