IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: poll on draft-ietf-rtgwg-ipfrr-ip-mib-08

<stephane.litkowski@orange.com> Mon, 22 February 2016 11:17 UTC

Return-Path: <stephane.litkowski@orange.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9DD41A1B1D for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 03:17:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PdlHbOxOfWDh for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 03:17:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias91.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AE5B1A1ADC for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 03:17:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omfedm08.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.4]) by omfedm14.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id D46DD22C245; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 12:17:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.31.69]) by omfedm08.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id AEEE6238048; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 12:17:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::65de:2f08:41e6:ebbe]) by OPEXCLILMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::bc1c:ad2f:eda3:8c3d%18]) with mapi id 14.03.0279.002; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 12:17:07 +0100
From: stephane.litkowski@orange.com
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, Jeff Tantsura <jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: poll on draft-ietf-rtgwg-ipfrr-ip-mib-08
Thread-Topic: poll on draft-ietf-rtgwg-ipfrr-ip-mib-08
Thread-Index: AQHRZcD2LWK9o3cuBkyeT/9FOM/BiJ8oyHuAgA8wBHA=
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:17:07 +0000
Message-ID: <15133_1456139827_56CAEE33_15133_335_8_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF92168BF984@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <A45E3A4B-AE6B-4790-BE8F-A2239BEC4221@ericsson.com> <D2E38B64.4D164%acee@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D2E38B64.4D164%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.1]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF92168BF984OPEXCLILMA4corp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 6.2.1.2478543, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2016.2.8.153315
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/tlQjV_hC6FX6TOXThriqR3sOPvY>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:17:12 -0000

Hi Acee,

The main question behind : is there any interest for vendors to implement it and operators to use it ?
Or : Are people more focused now on YANG and so it’s better to convert this work into a YANG work ? (note that we already embed some FRR informations in IGP models but it’s not 100% mapped to this MIB proposal).

Best Regards,

Stephane

From: rtgwg [mailto:rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 19:17
To: Jeff Tantsura; rtgwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: poll on draft-ietf-rtgwg-ipfrr-ip-mib-08

Hey Jeff,
I say that if the authors are committed, we go ahead and complete it. If not, we drop it.
Thanks,
Acee

From: rtgwg <rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Jeff Tantsura <jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com<mailto:jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com>>
Date: Friday, February 12, 2016 at 1:12 PM
To: Routing WG <rtgwg@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>>
Subject: poll on draft-ietf-rtgwg-ipfrr-ip-mib-08

Dear RTGWG,

We are considering further progress of draft-ietf-rtgwg-ipfrr-ip-mib-08 and would like to poll the wg to see whether there’s enough interest to proceed with this work, i.e. WGLC.
Please respond, especially if you feel this work has to continue, also - please let us know if there are any existing implementations.

Many thanks and see you in Buenos Aires.

Jeff & Chris

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email