Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types-16: (with COMMENT)
Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Thu, 12 October 2017 13:20 UTC
Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietf.org
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88491120720; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 06:20:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types@ietf.org, Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org, jefftant.ietf@gmail.com, rtgwg@ietf.org
Subject: Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types-16: (with COMMENT)
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.63.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <150781443454.16864.9884353629673389115.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 06:20:34 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/xLpcLAppHLbx_jhV4z95BwX2ZG8>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 13:20:35 -0000
Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types-16: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a small thing, but in general I think it would be preferable not to embed the name "iana" in identifiers that can be consumed programmatically (the namespace URN and module name). What distinguishes the iana-routing-types module seems to be that the types define values for address family identifiers, not the fact that the registries containing those identifiers happen to be administered by IANA. If somebody else administered those registries it would have no effect on the contents of the module.
- Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtgwg-… Alissa Cooper
- Re: Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-rt… Acee Lindem (acee)