Re: Comments on draft-ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection

I would also suggest that the authors of
draft-ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection add a reference to Section 5.1 of
RFC8402 (Segment Routing Architecture) which describes the Mirror SID.

Thanks,
Chris

On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:18 AM Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <ketant=
40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I am summarizing the questions/comments on the mike on the list with more
> details for a follow-up from the authors.
>
> 1) SRv6 Mirror SID is a new behavior for SRv6 SIDs that needs to be
> formally introduced, defined (using a pseudocode?) and a IANA code-point
> allocated for it. E.g. refer
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-16#section-4.6
> and for codepoint check
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-16#section-9.2.
> My question was whether the authors intended to add that in this document
> or a separate Spring document (may be the chairs can guide here)?
> Regardless, this would be something that would require review from the
> Spring WG.
>
> 2) Once (1) has been addressed, then it provides the necessary foundation
> for the review of the IGP encodings for signaling of SRv6 Mirror SIDs
> (Section 4). I would suggest that this proposal then get reviewed in the
> LSR WG - whether in this document or as a separate LSR draft is up to the
> chairs.
>
> Thanks,
> Ketan
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> rtgwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>