Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps
"庞冉(联通集团中国联通研究院-本 部)" <pangran@chinaunicom.cn> Fri, 08 April 2022 14:34 UTC
Return-Path: <pangran@chinaunicom.cn>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E7FD3A0CA3;
Fri, 8 Apr 2022 07:34:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 1X2nDTIhhf5V; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 07:34:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sendh.mailex.chinaunicom.cn (sendh.mailex.chinaunicom.cn
[210.53.66.231])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE28A3A0C5F;
Fri, 8 Apr 2022 07:34:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 0a000f36-7c5be70000001d87-56-625047e4a6de
Received: from M10-HQ-MLCEN05.cnc.intra (Unknown_Domain [10.249.212.35])
by sendh.mailex.chinaunicom.cn (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id
98.A8.07559.4E740526; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 22:34:12 +0800 (HKT)
Received: from M10-HQ-ML10.hq.cnc.intra (10.249.213.80) by
M10-HQ-MLCEN05.cnc.intra (10.249.212.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id
15.0.1497.28; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 22:34:12 +0800
Received: from M10-HQ-ML02.hq.cnc.intra (10.249.213.72) by
M10-HQ-ML10.hq.cnc.intra (10.249.213.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id
15.0.1497.28; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 22:34:04 +0800
Received: from M10-HQ-ML02.hq.cnc.intra ([fe80::188f:3140:120d:d79f]) by
M10-HQ-ML02.hq.cnc.intra ([fe80::188f:3140:120d:d79f%19]) with mapi id
15.00.1497.028; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 22:34:04 +0800
From: =?utf-8?B?5bqe5YaJKOiBlOmAmumbhuWbouS4reWbveiBlOmAmueglOeptumZoi3mnKw=?=
=?utf-8?B?6YOoKQ==?= <pangran@chinaunicom.cn>
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>,
rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, "rtg-ads@ietf.org" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps
Thread-Topic: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps
Thread-Index: AQHYS1WysuFpK6aMBkyUz43SMHHpNw==
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 14:34:04 +0000
Message-ID: <930d4171509f436590fcc686c2166e33@M10-HQ-ML02.hq.cnc.intra>
References: <204D8DE6-F51C-4551-B1D7-1D69DBCA3626@hxcore.ol>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [222.129.133.148]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_930d4171509f436590fcc686c2166e33M10HQML02hqcncintra_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrHIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsXC9fOKsu4T94AkgxtTZS1edfxksjg55wez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Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/zCUYKr64vR5_Oe9v0aaOdLIYRwk>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>,
<mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>,
<mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2022 14:34:25 -0000
Hi all, I support the creation of a new APN focus group, and would like to contribute to the WG. Best regards, Pang Ran. From: Jeff Tantsura<mailto:jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Date: 2022-04-06 01:14 To: RTGWG<mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>; rtgwg-chairs<mailto:rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>; rtg-ads@ietf.org<mailto:rtg-ads@ietf.org> Subject: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Dear RTGWG, APN has been presented at RTGWG multiple times, and we see the evolution of the documents, including the scope of the problem and framework. This topic needs collaboration across WGs; we can foresee that not all issues to be addressed are within the charter of RTGWG and would span beyond the Routing area. RTGWG is chartered to provide a venue for new work, there are a couple of different options and one option for handling such new work would be to recommend the development of a new WG. The Chairs would then want to recommend that the ADs consider forming a focus WG, with a set of well defined deliverables and milestones (after delivery the group would be shut down) to work on a framework for APN. We would like to solicit the WG for opinions. Please note that comments about existing APN documents should be sent to apn@ietf.org<mailto:apn@ietf.org>. This thread focuses on support or objection to recommending that the ADs consider the formation of a new WG. Please send your comments, support, or objectiond. Thanks! Cheers, Yingzhen Jeff 如果您错误接收了该邮件,请通过电子邮件立即通知我们。请回复邮件到 hqs-spmc@chinaunicom.cn,即可以退订此邮件。我们将立即将您的信息从我们的发送目录中删除。 If you have received this email in error please notify us immediately by e-mail. Please reply to hqs-spmc@chinaunicom.cn ,you can unsubscribe from this mail. We will immediately remove your information from send catalogue of our.
- RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Jeff Tantsura
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Joel M. Halpern
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps hsyu
- 答复: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Feng Yang
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Gyan Mishra
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps liupengyjy@chinamobile.com
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Donald Eastlake
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps zhangs366@chinaunicom.cn
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Lin He
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps strong
- RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps 鱼亚锋
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Stefano Previdi IETF
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Robert Raszuk
- RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Linda Dunbar
- RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Linda Dunbar
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Robert Raszuk
- RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Giuseppe Fioccola
- RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps UTTARO, JAMES
- RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps UTTARO, JAMES
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps duzongpeng@foxmail.com
- Re: RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps duzongpeng@foxmail.com
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Dhruv Dhody
- RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Luc-Fabrice Ndifor Ngwa [ MTN Cameroon ]
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps 庞冉(联通集团中国联通研究院-本 部)
- RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Adrian Farrel
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Luis M. Contreras
- RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Alexander Clemm
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Yichi Xu
- RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Dirk Trossen
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps chongfeng.xie@foxmail.com
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps zhuyq8@chinatelecom.cn
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps 贺鲲鹏
- RE: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Jeff Tantsura
- Re: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Liang Felix