IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Rucus] minutes (was: Re: IETF75: lunch on thursday?)

Hendrik Scholz <hs@123.org> Tue, 04 August 2009 11:18 UTC

Return-Path: <hs@123.org>
X-Original-To: rucus@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rucus@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67B913A701D for <rucus@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 04:18:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c+SNiqN+0V+f for <rucus@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 04:18:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brian.123.org (brian.123.org [78.47.108.129]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF6D3A69BE for <rucus@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 04:18:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [194.97.6.12] (fnki-lxclnet001.freenet-ag.de [194.97.6.12]) by brian.123.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09B23C38140 for <rucus@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:18:09 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4A781914.2010704@123.org>
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:18:44 +0200
From: Hendrik Scholz <hs@123.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rucus@ietf.org
References: <4A6F0393.3070203@123.org> <4A6F6851.2090001@stpeter.im> <4A6F68C2.4090007@ericsson.com> <4A714654.5090504@123.org> <B94940C43117794C9432FF5FF0CCB506B6D26C@VENUS.office> <618e24240907300125n149a4438gefb014c3a348a385@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <618e24240907300125n149a4438gefb014c3a348a385@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Rucus] minutes (was: Re: IETF75: lunch on thursday?)
X-BeenThere: rucus@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Reducing Unwanted Communication Using SIP \(RUCUS\)" <rucus.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rucus>, <mailto:rucus-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rucus>
List-Post: <mailto:rucus@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rucus-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rucus>, <mailto:rucus-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 11:18:09 -0000

Hi!

Well, there isn't much worth writing about regarding the last
meeting.
Victor Pascual Avila, Jan Janak, Nils Ohlmeier, Jan Seedorf and me
gathered for some food.

Some companies/organizations cut back on spendings with regards
to Anti-SPIT development/research and thus not too much is happening.
No interesting new SPIT case was found (I guess that could
be good or bad ;).

No consent was found during a discussion on the SPAM score draft.
We have contradicting believes on whether this approach makes sense
and if ITSPs would trust headers sent by remote/originating SSPs.

I also mentioned that the VoIP Security Alliance (VoIPSA.org)
needs some more traffic and an overhaul of their good but
outdated whitepaper. If you have some time to spare it might
be worth contributing.

Since IETF 71 I summarized a few issues and uploaded
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-scholz-endpoint-security-00.txt
Please post feedback on this to the list or directly to me.
I plan on uploading an updated version in time for Hiroshima.

Cheers,
 Hendrik

-- 
Hendrik Scholz <hs@123.org>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email