[Rucus] ARF BoF: no SIP?

"Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com> Fri, 18 September 2009 00:10 UTC

Return-Path: <dwing@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rucus@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rucus@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67FBE3A6816 for <rucus@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:10:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id clQ7oXRpg8qd for <rucus@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:10:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D7613A67A4 for <rucus@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:10:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsEAC9tskqrR7PD/2dsb2JhbACKbrFTiFABkCgFhBw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,406,1249257600"; d="scan'208";a="243507884"
Received: from sj-dkim-3.cisco.com ([171.71.179.195]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Sep 2009 00:11:50 +0000
Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com (sj-core-4.cisco.com [171.68.223.138]) by sj-dkim-3.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n8I0BoaO016745 for <rucus@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:11:50 -0700
Received: from xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-221.cisco.com [128.107.191.63]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8I0Bmmc024188 for <rucus@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:11:50 GMT
Received: from xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.187]) by xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:11:00 -0700
Received: from dwingwxp01 ([128.107.163.93]) by xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:11:00 -0700
From: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
To: rucus@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:11:01 -0700
Message-ID: <021101ca37f4$81144e60$5da36b80@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Thread-Index: Aco39IDbl1z4BXNuRo6BMk9ajBaIsw==
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Sep 2009 00:11:00.0595 (UTC) FILETIME=[80CD0C30:01CA37F4]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=274; t=1253232710; x=1254096710; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim3002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=dwing@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Dan=20Wing=22=20<dwing@cisco.com> |Subject:=20ARF=20BoF=3A=20no=20SIP? |Sender:=20; bh=y0TbRG01HP9rwXNT6C6YYv/FTfztw1P0BnvxumYx+nI=; b=Y9nLILQSJddYxN8xjtT85dAwI9ywzQxn08rMPZ76sXjJ4tyi3KIrLdTaGH FtMALiAp5T8EOiA8UWND+Vrrbzd5K5R837AyO/0uUJ8/qeDg0F6jOfn5ItyR /WwWHcol2T;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-3; header.From=dwing@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim3002 verified; );
Subject: [Rucus] ARF BoF: no SIP?
X-BeenThere: rucus@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Reducing Unwanted Communication Using SIP \(RUCUS\)" <rucus.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rucus>, <mailto:rucus-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rucus>
List-Post: <mailto:rucus@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rucus-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rucus>, <mailto:rucus-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:10:58 -0000

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg00833.html
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki

Interesting that while they list SSH, FTP, and "web server" attacks as
possible extensions, but SIP isn't listed.

Anyone want to tackle that one?

-d