Re: [Rucus] SPIT Misuse Classification?
Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu> Tue, 09 February 2010 13:47 UTC
Return-Path: <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>
X-Original-To: rucus@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rucus@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D31BD3A7393 for <rucus@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 05:47:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lnl46htkrXuj for <rucus@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 05:47:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tarap.cc.columbia.edu (tarap.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.7]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE2CB3A71D6 for <rucus@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 05:47:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from upstairs.home (pool-173-54-225-147.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net [173.54.225.147]) (user=hgs10 mech=PLAIN bits=0) by tarap.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o19DmDuW005162 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 9 Feb 2010 08:48:13 -0500 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>
In-Reply-To: <3D3C75174CB95F42AD6BCC56E5555B45022D51B7@FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 08:48:13 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <592946D5-B7B1-4C18-9B4F-25DABD67C0E8@cs.columbia.edu>
References: <3D3C75174CB95F42AD6BCC56E5555B45022D51B7@FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net>
To: "Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
X-No-Spam-Score: Local
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 128.59.29.7
Cc: rucus@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Rucus] SPIT Misuse Classification?
X-BeenThere: rucus@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Reducing Unwanted Communication Using SIP \(RUCUS\)" <rucus.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rucus>, <mailto:rucus-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rucus>
List-Post: <mailto:rucus@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rucus-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rucus>, <mailto:rucus-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:47:10 -0000
Can you explain what you mean by "SPIT misuse"? All SPIT would seem to be mis/abuse... On Feb 9, 2010, at 8:16 AM, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) wrote: > Hi all, > > I am looking for a classification of SPIT misuse. Has someone worked on > such a classification terminology or seen it elsewhere? > > Thanks in advance! > > Ciao > Hannes > _______________________________________________ > Rucus mailing list > Rucus@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rucus >
- [Rucus] SPIT Misuse Classification? Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [Rucus] SPIT Misuse Classification? Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [Rucus] SPIT Misuse Classification? Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [Rucus] SPIT Misuse Classification? Avasarala Ranjit-A20990