IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rucus] ARF BoF: no SIP?

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Fri, 18 September 2009 00:20 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: rucus@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rucus@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E17143A67A4 for <rucus@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:20:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.435
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.435 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.164, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q-Y4W79EnFK2 for <rucus@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:20:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DE123A68B1 for <rucus@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:20:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from squire.local (dsl-179-156.dynamic-dsl.frii.net [216.17.179.156]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B06F340D1F; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:21:07 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4AB2D260.3070401@stpeter.im>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:20:48 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
References: <021101ca37f4$81144e60$5da36b80@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <021101ca37f4$81144e60$5da36b80@cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: rucus@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Rucus] ARF BoF: no SIP?
X-BeenThere: rucus@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Reducing Unwanted Communication Using SIP \(RUCUS\)" <rucus.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rucus>, <mailto:rucus-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rucus>
List-Post: <mailto:rucus@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rucus-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rucus>, <mailto:rucus-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:20:28 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 9/17/09 6:11 PM, Dan Wing wrote:
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg00833.html
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki
> 
> Interesting that while they list SSH, FTP, and "web server" attacks as
> possible extensions, but SIP isn't listed.

Yes, including VoIP and IM attacks would be worthwhile...

Peter

- --
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkqy0mAACgkQNL8k5A2w/vxiLwCgh7AlwxLXAEHQdWTi5omYzS+u
aWkAoLulvJSlkEssuiY4o+klHGWryc6A
=5j8D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email