Re: [Rum] draft-ietf-rum-rue-02.txt: Configuration

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Wed, 29 January 2020 22:51 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: rum@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rum@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFBBF12002F for <rum@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 14:51:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alum.mit.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zDSEpepsg0Zc for <rum@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 14:51:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NAM11-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn8nam11on2084.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.236.84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E890120019 for <rum@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 14:51:17 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=X7JLmX8RKs6xtC3EwUdlNGpiIuKIglAf+1SWx2AB5IYT8MJv/sSpj/MnwSWd7iYcO4DMF32FKKZUpbRPj7kctr1msxlYmf6uI0ruNbOeP1REQjnG9Q0KsbiTCRD5C4CCSIJc14fHkbjgm7IfPUghdmVIJcZJQsmPePgF1qP4hOoCbYSnhGkZTBMCxDmb7E4N/NccfySjhMrvJN7l4roNFGG7jRz5ZDcRUbRNyEIll+HWpOx5GYDS3yL4XNzB0blh9jeSRIOycCnfhFzWZC8UlReBCjbpbfb2xEK12A4i74qd1CnJcm9+1Xup9SL+YzjyGSylOcIr9RTmWlJex4H3og==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=lgOB1tMmxDt7Vh6zexkxbNfm8YqJy0OQRgjBYN7c08Q=; b=c4lxkc/usZK/asmtabbnU2Am4+nYSWwm0v2d3N635o1p1oQob9BbGvC7PiWKTWfVaad+eD8FNKZZwlPAqHO3Qnib6duwEnOlEn3EfSZ6LyiO7SsBF+nsUVSJ0VnwKeFBa0G0S5jsPGog2SYtX9H2/EYhD6wBA2WS10+YO7xPQ2ai4QXhyw4FL7Ur4yk5XVLzmN8juq1cW+CSxNNAQ8LxCdqDE42If7/NxGayT3eAauKZFSINgFd2CitKJfnOIMf3byM1ytNeg0n8+KPdduihqiHmj73QUVFJ1G8sC6GayjJKIIbt+cgFVYkXVcGpQke9NsvLz/yLUnTya8xHzio1BQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 18.7.68.33) smtp.rcpttodomain=ietf.org smtp.mailfrom=alum.mit.edu; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=alum.mit.edu; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alum.mit.edu; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=lgOB1tMmxDt7Vh6zexkxbNfm8YqJy0OQRgjBYN7c08Q=; b=NbMP64Cv8Vr+yP7bEnalSvEg7qUmYjxr1MyJWuglTweaX4iYE6aKwpdIPGJGHLs7eXwJT3ooAczscFE6/NVMqKJ464C9/nXFylXSqpmLzKHSg7wahvRIg3/yfMeqH/AbFiaK4EWmf7YG8FhlzzbWKZ3C0KQ2iNEYZJIBffjvYbc=
Received: from BN8PR12CA0006.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:60::19) by DM5PR12MB1129.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:7a::7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2665.23; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 22:51:15 +0000
Received: from BL2NAM02FT006.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:f400:7e46::201) by BN8PR12CA0006.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:408:60::19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2665.20 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 22:51:15 +0000
Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 18.7.68.33) smtp.mailfrom=alum.mit.edu; ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=alum.mit.edu;
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of alum.mit.edu designates 18.7.68.33 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=18.7.68.33; helo=outgoing-alum.mit.edu;
Received: from outgoing-alum.mit.edu (18.7.68.33) by BL2NAM02FT006.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.76.239) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2686.25 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 22:51:15 +0000
Received: from Kokiri.localdomain (c-24-62-227-142.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.62.227.142]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as pkyzivat@ALUM.MIT.EDU) by outgoing-alum.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 00TMpDf6011608 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <rum@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 17:51:14 -0500
To: rum@ietf.org
References: <158033443345.2803.14350232562292068648@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <d1156d7d-59fb-6af3-7968-822f579b9a46@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 17:51:13 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <158033443345.2803.14350232562292068648@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:18.7.68.33; IPV:CAL; SCL:-1; CTRY:US; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(346002)(39860400002)(396003)(136003)(376002)(189003)(199004)(31696002)(7596002)(70206006)(70586007)(5660300002)(26005)(786003)(316002)(75432002)(36906005)(2906002)(86362001)(6916009)(53546011)(336012)(956004)(2616005)(966005)(26826003)(356004)(8676002)(66574012)(246002)(478600001)(186003)(31686004)(8936002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DM5PR12MB1129; H:outgoing-alum.mit.edu; FPR:; SPF:Pass; LANG:en; PTR:outgoing-alum.mit.edu; MX:1; A:1;
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 2dc8e145-67df-4712-68b9-08d7a50dbedf
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: DM5PR12MB1129:
X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: <DM5PR12MB112981521F799BB3ADAAAC93F9050@DM5PR12MB1129.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:10000;
X-Forefront-PRVS: 02973C87BC
X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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
X-OriginatorOrg: alum.mit.edu
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jan 2020 22:51:15.1104 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 2dc8e145-67df-4712-68b9-08d7a50dbedf
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 3326b102-c043-408b-a990-b89e477d582f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=3326b102-c043-408b-a990-b89e477d582f; Ip=[18.7.68.33]; Helo=[outgoing-alum.mit.edu]
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR12MB1129
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rum/4u8iaxFoOcqv_Pjs8VoEyr7plrM>
Subject: Re: [Rum] draft-ietf-rum-rue-02.txt: Configuration
X-BeenThere: rum@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Relay User Machine <rum.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rum>, <mailto:rum-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rum/>
List-Post: <mailto:rum@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rum-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rum>, <mailto:rum-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 22:51:20 -0000

Brian,

Thanks for the update. I think I will have a number of questions once 
have more time for study, but I have one right off:

Section 9 says that there is one file for device configuration. That 
won't make it practical for a single RUE to support a user with accounts 
with multiple providers. Rather, to be workable it will be necessary for 
there to be a configuration file for each provider that the user of the 
RUE uses.

The exact mechanism for setting that up needs to be worked out. Perhaps 
it would be sufficient for there to be another entry, for each provider, 
in the provider list file that is used by the RUE to retrieve the 
configuration for that provider.

	Thanks,
	Paul

On 1/29/20 4:47 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Relay User Machine WG of the IETF.
> 
>          Title           : Interoperability Profile for Relay User Equipment
>          Author          : Brian Rosen
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-rum-rue-02.txt
> 	Pages           : 28
> 	Date            : 2020-01-29
> 
> Abstract:
>     Video Relay Service (VRS) is a term used to describe a method by
>     which a hearing persons can communicate with deaf/Hard of Hearing
>     user using an interpreter ("Communications Assistant") connected via
>     a videophone to the deaf/HoH user and an audio telephone call to the
>     hearing user.  The CA interprets using sign language on the
>     videophone link and voice on the telephone link.  Often the
>     interpreters may be supplied by a company or agency termed a
>     "provider" in this document.  The provider also provides a video
>     service that allows users to connect video devices to their service,
>     and subsequently to CAs and other dead/HoH users.  It is desirable
>     that the videophones used by the deaf/HoH/H-I user conform to a
>     standard so that any device may be used with any provider and that
>     video calls direct between deaf/HoH users work.  This document
>     describes the interface between a videophone and a provider.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rum-rue/
> 
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rum-rue-02
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rum-rue-02
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rum-rue-02
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>