Re: [Rum] Adoption of draft-rosen-rue-01 as a RUM WG draft

Paul,Think there is a typo maybe... 

draft-ietf-run-rue-00
Should it be draft-ietf-rum-rue-00:
Roger Slusser

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
To: rum <rum@ietf.org>
Sent: Tue, Sep 17, 2019 4:32 pm
Subject: [Rum] Adoption of draft-rosen-rue-01 as a RUM WG draft

RUM followers:

The deadline for comments on the call for adoption of draft-rosen-rue-01 
concluded on Sunday Sept 15.

Summarizing the comments that came in:

- 8 people indicated a desire to adopt;
- 3 people expressed some concerns with the document.

In my judgement the concerns raised are all worth of further pursuit. 
But I don't see any problem in addressing those via revisions to the 
proposed document. Since no alternative document has been offered, I 
conclude that we should adopt draft-rosen-rue-01 as a working group 
document aimed at satisfying our sole milestone: "Submit a profile of 
SIP and media features for use with video relay services to the IESG for 
publication".

The author is requested to submit a new version of the document ASAP, 
with the name changed to: draft-ietf-run-rue-00 signifying it as a WG 
document.

I also request that people now start posting to this mailing list issues 
with this document. Where possible, please start a separate thread with 
a meaningful title for each issue in order to facilitate orderly 
discussion of the issues. Note that once we seem to have consensus on 
the resolution to an issue then suggestions of specific text changes are 
welcome.

    Thanks,
    Paul (as RUM co-chair)

On 8/29/19 9:50 AM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> This is a call for the adoption of draft-rosen-rue-01 as a RUM wg 
> document. This is intended to evolve into the document our charter calls 
> for.
> 
> Comments, pro or con, on this proposal are due by Sunday September 15.
> 
>      Thanks,
>      Paul Kyzivat, as RUM co-chair
> 

-- 
Rum mailing list
Rum@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rum