Re: [Rum] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-rum-rue-09: (with COMMENT)

Brian Rosen <br@brianrosen.net> Thu, 23 December 2021 19:38 UTC

Return-Path: <br@brianrosen.net>
X-Original-To: rum@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rum@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D6093A0964 for <rum@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 11:38:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.888
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.888 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=brianrosen-net.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vUqYYcUy2CQ9 for <rum@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 11:38:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2f.google.com (mail-io1-xd2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B5C83A096B for <rum@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 11:38:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2f.google.com with SMTP id x6so8316422iol.13 for <rum@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 11:38:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brianrosen-net.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=eN17vate/gwUnDSZGtmhf00klAurelO/rJIjwGwrxKQ=; b=6jhI1xGnsB816oasaO4AAcu6KX9/LdgY+PSJuyKpkfmGSCGxG4gfi2LA46ryNqvL28 SS4X2pybGqUWX8RrOWvhMqWRBj/dol0HUBddYpWsGqEk9Dpxhm7nVc+Uqw9pAy/nINlM HdX7tgxVX5mYLrCDBE1bVmHTP+XVbSOfLftTNvBCyWcTx/4S/XGGguT26rA+NIINbzfP LoDENmE80PLz2fjfZqrbFskQa4R8+y9Dh/okQl/XURXHbUcuWerhVuzFMg3bdWEsv+ja ys+ejTif99rxwlpWBTJW6j6MiGAVxb7YmHZ4G/lVzrdPaRL5cMP89QMQVqBmHgDlvJa8 cmuw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=eN17vate/gwUnDSZGtmhf00klAurelO/rJIjwGwrxKQ=; b=4ikvmGpMd7kHUIb44ZU5zReYfntS9rBh7j5GUXvHnWSoX582QrIV7YfF2zdmg+x1zZ dspI7+d5pcfUPI7Abw/3sjGEntoC0WXrDXTW5pCIAttV6nL7A+USf/70hbW/er2+sgTp DUaJS9ljHuTe8yt3unCJKN1IzaAzkCfP2cPi1t4XLvBnHlwqGLJBLRDF1vJnlsAHLKc+ pG5zNgfhWLsFvKy0Zt4ik/Q9pOW4FPPJgLGMUcv4KvqQPshB0SQ5PEqB3uyja2SiJIii PxSPv0fO/7zcrIzpBw+C5W0fu1HrvMNaq0PnLmfS47V4owOcs/KhB/AaQk5CwvTRV+Nv ZnIw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5320kNavY3BbgtJYcjn+eoIfD8G/pgd+LKFFk7H6bRXcnf0YnfBM i1JszPcsNULsg7ckBpM2M5URQA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzTi0ds9Uq5wmWHd/OHhafBDKC6/Z+k8svlZnS/rETA7veNyV+nS7eOdyL4T+1Y+15xQRCIBg==
X-Received: by 2002:a02:2385:: with SMTP id u127mr2129222jau.88.1640288292617; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 11:38:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (dynamic-acs-24-154-121-237.zoominternet.net. [24.154.121.237]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j6sm3200275ilc.8.2021.12.23.11.38.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 23 Dec 2021 11:38:12 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.20.0.1.32\))
From: Brian Rosen <br@brianrosen.net>
In-Reply-To: <163920628875.27251.17036356913022296501@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 14:38:10 -0500
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-rum-rue@ietf.org, rum-chairs@ietf.org, rum@ietf.org, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <69D24488-2048-4A02-8688-DD124D22A561@brianrosen.net>
References: <163920628875.27251.17036356913022296501@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.20.0.1.32)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rum/Hynyo3VmiYREg2_mpg2Kp6apXoU>
Subject: Re: [Rum] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-rum-rue-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: rum@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Relay User Machine <rum.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rum>, <mailto:rum-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rum/>
List-Post: <mailto:rum@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rum-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rum>, <mailto:rum-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 19:38:19 -0000

Thank you for your comments.  I have made these changes to the next version.

Brian

> On Dec 11, 2021, at 2:04 AM, Erik Kline via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-rum-rue-09: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rum-rue/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> [S5; nit]
> 
> * Both RFCs 6655 and 6665 are mentioned.  I think the 6655 reference
>  should actually be to 6665 (unless "AES-CCM Cipher Suites for TLS" is
>  of specific importance).
> 
> [S6; nit]
> 
> * W.R.T.: "Mandatory to Implement" means a conforming implementation must
>  implement the specified capability.
> 
>  It seems like, since 8174 is in use, this "must" might be a "MUST",
>  to avoid any ambiguity.
> 
> 
>