Re: [Rum] Call for WG adoption of: draft-rosen-rue-01
Richard Shields <richard@sorenson.com> Fri, 13 September 2019 15:22 UTC
Return-Path: <richard@sorenson.com>
X-Original-To: rum@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rum@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9FC712007C for <rum@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 08:22:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sorenson.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XecbqW5JpTjb for <rum@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 08:22:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM04-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr700057.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.70.57]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C75E120047 for <rum@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 08:22:31 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=BaMxkTcMsriMdtJEKxEaFiXE5JQh7+r/TTbd8lovcJxcxBTSse2ceVh+VBLyr/TVhJ9kWWFDq3DyGjrkvqmxvdgNrLh6UglbmOhdi0WAGvRLxHMSCIrPGp1VXduiDhY88v8B7WlCXijyuOiZ0vHv+r0HIkQRt5WK/gTYQ1rYXLcFQcPjMxJ4tDJaMBCq8pHllh7pjwKiAFFshiXY4HsNPRa4VziUuT9tf59m/dPHHV33YQpz1LUvZbU0HmdCX/wrlb8kMo3FaY6VurGeo1cwOhW/3zSsbXNa3oOpk9hRIKb4RRE6alqnumCUR9zMee5i4v+2Nr3l094xwRk8xFDrPg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=z5JCeU1KYG2r6XbAwElRIRtmsr6MijKXS8y4Jneg/04=; b=BtDLt2fTMmfNpPANpzpX4Bu4MjbXwRAyKN/JPkNv4PTSQD7ZJhMj46gjnsX6I2m0iYp2EscEmMHWcjId8wPGi7URGHP3E/yuB4qO8iFicXW0Xgk1mtPFMN6THoRZFLdWktwZx5ZL0gZ1Wqr3hJCOjdFSveQ4goH9SYr8RaOGxPwCpspjUGnjZmyCq3nZOZ32qKhcmAtmFZ9ntLbP8YYuGXT4STQrCWRjZ9qDwXPVFCill6EDYIG8DxqBDpFa68rMIu5XQbDxU0Leag+14xBRhfDIVG0y197HY4l9DzKJwKH8LfavNQOWjwChtYD/W+aOzI5LxnNc6LkiA61bjRI5WA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sorenson.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=sorenson.com; dkim=pass header.d=sorenson.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sorenson.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-sorenson-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=z5JCeU1KYG2r6XbAwElRIRtmsr6MijKXS8y4Jneg/04=; b=jgwfaJNH1HCCtCM8WlKzU2A3oRhhzRUVQXOBsas0cxxvcKu9D2vJK7QDjjw9DxIdWkZllorbdCebOrJtrEa9SzcTChbSa5ZVHjluS5E8aXzvjm7CakWnadXJcSxcDItbm6zS5MAFXy9MMshtxNCKQLsBaBl+1R6gDqiL4gTxYhQ=
Received: from MWHPR04MB0991.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.174.250.10) by MWHPR04MB0703.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.172.168.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2241.18; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:22:29 +0000
Received: from MWHPR04MB0991.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d03d:2cd4:1055:67df]) by MWHPR04MB0991.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d03d:2cd4:1055:67df%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2263.018; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:22:29 +0000
From: Richard Shields <richard@sorenson.com>
To: James Hamlin <james.hamlin@purple.us>, "rum@ietf.org" <rum@ietf.org>
CC: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Thread-Topic: [Rum] Call for WG adoption of: draft-rosen-rue-01
Thread-Index: AQHVaBF1VkomULJvVEmMBHrwAG6tkKcpslMAgAAEVYCAAAZxgIAAAEgQ
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:22:29 +0000
Message-ID: <MWHPR04MB0991B268CB26104EF61AC058C5B30@MWHPR04MB0991.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
References: <f3c1d9fe-8785-86e9-4220-e7d7971b29d4@alum.mit.edu>, <ef8dec34-af0d-d4e4-be33-a28a0c9bd0b4@alum.mit.edu> <1568385648772.69603@purple.us>, <MWHPR04MB09910881CB5EBC510E9A350CC5B30@MWHPR04MB0991.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> <1568387962077.82824@purple.us>
In-Reply-To: <1568387962077.82824@purple.us>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=richard@sorenson.com;
x-originating-ip: [209.169.244.29]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: bf1c5bc6-b2d9-4916-694a-08d7385e3123
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600166)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:MWHPR04MB0703;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MWHPR04MB0703:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MWHPR04MB0703F3324FAAA320ADA17AB0C5B30@MWHPR04MB0703.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0159AC2B97
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(346002)(376002)(366004)(39860400002)(396003)(136003)(199004)(189003)(13464003)(8676002)(6436002)(11346002)(486006)(66574012)(966005)(14454004)(229853002)(53546011)(6506007)(186003)(478600001)(76116006)(26005)(71190400001)(71200400001)(476003)(256004)(2501003)(55016002)(102836004)(9686003)(66066001)(305945005)(53936002)(6246003)(25786009)(2906002)(74316002)(446003)(86362001)(6306002)(4326008)(14444005)(6116002)(3846002)(7736002)(33656002)(5660300002)(7696005)(99286004)(110136005)(316002)(66476007)(66556008)(64756008)(66446008)(8936002)(52536014)(81156014)(81166006)(66946007)(76176011)(561944003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MWHPR04MB0703; H:MWHPR04MB0991.namprd04.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: sorenson.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: JoBmKNpGGE3aCcfxXxccsprJ6Bb4pM9B+aCz1ewhKiAZka5s7DYdj7BIejwvjs8hyJ5FCAbAqUvJ9iZ2kOv1nQpD4v5fjO9GbrXjv48/vW5rh20uorEO1nA7SzbbL4qdKGpa/j+sf4gDtsidPiwKV1mM+q0AYAtzOX9Qr5zVNW/YLQHxogcIOHti1Hst3ews/x3xL6pRcByDil0VJ7mNq6AZoYHQ3QAnIEFkgoYjwAVZtfbrfqk412dqBbVmX/z/tSZQMqCUOkyMqdcye5zrOi417yJTuCCkPlZKphIt8QIy+Xst5cLEGRHq+JrUy3fRlD75q1n/afABdI7qvNkyji+yLMSVC+OLwlhzLe/IfMn56JSftL/Vub0xbacU63lY+347FmYuMre2DDsIHlQGxVlxsS1L5DsWBe0hOzUk4jY=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: sorenson.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: bf1c5bc6-b2d9-4916-694a-08d7385e3123
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Sep 2019 15:22:29.7890 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 6b03ef08-a104-48c4-a951-f18d295428d5
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: ng96IvSp+wDMbDfDV7m2BO2hz1tMcTd5FABn1FQTcRcoMQjVDf4u8UvCvrokVEIcxgpbs1v4xf8sewvKQtH4JA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MWHPR04MB0703
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rum/cGTg2iV7E1JNQUVso85r9Fty9hg>
Subject: Re: [Rum] Call for WG adoption of: draft-rosen-rue-01
X-BeenThere: rum@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Relay User Machine <rum.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rum>, <mailto:rum-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rum/>
List-Post: <mailto:rum@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rum-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rum>, <mailto:rum-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:22:35 -0000
Thanks, James. Section 5 of RFC 7742 states this: "WebRTC-compatible endpoints" are free to implement any video codecs they see fit. This follows logically from the definition of "WebRTC- compatible endpoint". It is, of course, advisable to implement at least one of the video codecs that is mandated for WebRTC browsers, and implementors are encouraged to do so. Does that not alleviate the requirement to implement VP8? Thanks, Richard -----Original Message----- From: James Hamlin [mailto:james.hamlin@purple.us] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2019 9:19 AM To: Richard Shields <richard@sorenson.com>; rum@ietf.org Cc: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Subject: Re: [Rum] Call for WG adoption of: draft-rosen-rue-01 [EXTERNAL] Richard This was mentioned and I think the provider side is "WebRTC-compatible endpoint". But the text currently in 7.3 and 7.4 treats provider and RUE identically. Best regards James ________________________________________ From: Richard Shields <richard@sorenson.com> Sent: 13 September 2019 16:02 To: James Hamlin; rum@ietf.org Cc: Paul Kyzivat Subject: RE: [Rum] Call for WG adoption of: draft-rosen-rue-01 This may have been brought up before. RFC 7742, referenced in section 7.3, has three endpoint definitions: a WebRTC browser, a WebRTC non-browser, and a WebRTC-compatible endpoint, with different levels of MTI regarding VP8. With the proposed RUE document, what are VRS endpoints considered? Thanks, Richard -----Original Message----- From: Rum [mailto:rum-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Hamlin Sent: Friday, September 13, 2019 8:41 AM To: rum@ietf.org Cc: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Subject: Re: [Rum] Call for WG adoption of: draft-rosen-rue-01 [EXTERNAL] Paul I think we agreed that OPUS and VP8 wouldn't need to be supported on the provider side, for good reasons. The draft proposed for adoption seems to contradict this with "RUE and Providers MUST" in sections 7.3 and 7.4 . Is the procedure that the document is adopted, with some agreed changes missing, and then amended? Best regards James ________________________________________ From: Rum <rum-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Sent: 10 September 2019 20:53 To: rum@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Rum] Call for WG adoption of: draft-rosen-rue-01 Reminder, This call for adoption will end next Sunday. All responses so far have been in support, but there haven't been a lot of them. If you haven't yet responded, please do. Thanks, Paul, as RUM co-chair On 8/29/19 9:50 AM, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > This is a call for the adoption of draft-rosen-rue-01 as a RUM wg > document. This is intended to evolve into the document our charter > calls for. > > Comments, pro or con, on this proposal are due by Sunday September 15. > > Thanks, > Paul Kyzivat, as RUM co-chair > -- Rum mailing list Rum@ietf.org https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwww.ietf.org%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2frum&c=E,1,XvDLRFtOorYTD_ZHqiyi_6x1eB_6gpdbTan7J17J5oZXHwBsGhr18IwuVwzvg_zkMdHAf0ubd1nNm-m4DNvAqH2M7I7ipp3wdXgwAUBL0XHEd7ncuIhgpdZkwg,,&typo=0 -- Rum mailing list Rum@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rum
- [Rum] Call for WG adoption of: draft-rosen-rue-01 Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Rum] Call for WG adoption of: draft-rosen-ru… Gunnar Hellström
- Re: [Rum] Call for WG adoption of: draft-rosen-ru… Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [Rum] Call for WG adoption of: draft-rosen-ru… Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [Rum] [EXT] Re: Call for WG adoption of: draf… Malloy, Jim
- Re: [Rum] Call for WG adoption of: draft-rosen-ru… Brian Rosen
- Re: [Rum] [EXT] Re: Call for WG adoption of: draf… Janett, Amy E.
- Re: [Rum] [EXT] Re: Call for WG adoption of: draf… Eric Burger
- Re: [Rum] Call for WG adoption of: draft-rosen-ru… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Rum] Call for WG adoption of: draft-rosen-ru… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Rum] Call for WG adoption of: draft-rosen-ru… James Hamlin
- Re: [Rum] Call for WG adoption of: draft-rosen-ru… Richard Shields
- Re: [Rum] Call for WG adoption of: draft-rosen-ru… James Hamlin
- Re: [Rum] Call for WG adoption of: draft-rosen-ru… Richard Shields
- Re: [Rum] Call for WG adoption of: draft-rosen-ru… James Hamlin
- Re: [Rum] Call for WG adoption of: draft-rosen-ru… Richard Shields
- Re: [Rum] Call for WG adoption of: draft-rosen-ru… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Rum] Call for WG adoption of: draft-rosen-ru… Isaac Roach
- Re: [Rum] Call for WG adoption of: draft-rosen-ru… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Rum] Call for WG adoption of: draft-rosen-ru… Brian Rosen
- Re: [Rum] Call for WG adoption of: draft-rosen-ru… James Hamlin
- Re: [Rum] Call for WG adoption of: draft-rosen-ru… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Rum] Call for WG adoption of: draft-rosen-ru… Brian Rosen
- Re: [Rum] Call for WG adoption of: draft-rosen-ru… Paul Kyzivat
- [Rum] Adoption of draft-rosen-rue-01 as a RUM WG … Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Rum] Adoption of draft-rosen-rue-01 as a RUM… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Rum] Adoption of draft-rosen-rue-01 as a RUM… Roger Slusser