IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rum] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on charter-ietf-rum-00-02: (with COMMENT)

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Wed, 10 April 2019 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rum@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rum@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69486120611; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 08:30:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.65
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.65 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ey3RULrG3BIN; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 08:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it1-f177.google.com (mail-it1-f177.google.com [209.85.166.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19EDE12060F; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 08:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it1-f177.google.com with SMTP id w15so4095780itc.0; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 08:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XfqHGTkKJ5gBKW7Tv56wVq8DsDdN90cK1iK14LgJORo=; b=MHlxEeW3P5Gv6JbJCklr4fTg/qsg6gt9RlDUdTpfuIQUp6KrjZ08rk4a/aM2fupfdp sNUX/dB4GStno8BQheI3Dx3PqtjqELvgQjU+IaptxMnLTcF0wLVZxOsO+0/SoWYWe0NC kBEymssFJTz06TJ0PIfMgg3LA1s1CPvgMhyLYHMVqT1hkfO4Heh1fUtp5suss7C9KogK QyQhnNlFcAvn50IqiSW1raPCxKPg4xQ6X1iej6RfZMClavrB1vXyE4nE6ijH597OHebT aH5vIy5kAHoVfKZ/NwANYTSoRuJOXSnG6lIdffHJjHU9dWTRlonCS6D/vAPY84aobDBf /TUg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXBKFalAkiADho06aF+HuNBNOyVUD32iAHEXuQN3Gr+8VfDGWnf lzY36Grj6thsTu+uz8J5ib8GRNw16cvgh5hMscSyew==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwrPqB5iNV0kboN7rCCTMXg13vubkv5NB7qQzlPLkFIRi3mBnOXNuT73F9n84nbUOCUZwlLX6LaFZS+3z72Xe0=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:3d94:: with SMTP id n142mr3527096itn.147.1554910220054; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 08:30:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <155490930181.9012.10425075507990091132.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <155490930181.9012.10425075507990091132.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 11:30:08 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJJMRXfK1W+=3EtwXrGZ3tBhMc=fSbU79r4ZBhDu9hn-KQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, rum@ietf.org, rum-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rum/ni3kb77iSdkLBzHJ8pEblfb1w2A>
Subject: Re: [Rum] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on charter-ietf-rum-00-02: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: rum@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Relay User Machine <rum.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rum>, <mailto:rum-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rum/>
List-Post: <mailto:rum@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rum-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rum>, <mailto:rum-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 15:30:32 -0000

> I still find it a bit excessive to create a 8-month working group for one document

Really?  Why?

I think it's a perfect way to handle things, creating a short-lived,
tightly focused working group for this sort of thing.  It's far better
than AD-sponsoring a document, which almost always gets inadequate
community review.  We've used such working groups very effectively in
the ART area (and its predecessors).

Barry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email