Re: We've got lift-off

Sally Hambridge <sallyh@LUDWIG.SC.INTEL.COM> Mon, 30 April 2001 15:35 UTC

Received: from mailbag.cps.intel.com ([192.102.199.72]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id LAA15545 for <run-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 11:35:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailbag.intel.com (mailbag.cps.intel.com [192.102.199.72]) by mailbag.cps.intel.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/d: relay.m4,v 1.6 2000/11/24 22:10:56 iwep Exp iwep $) with ESMTP id IAA12913; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 08:15:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MAILBAG.INTEL.COM by MAILBAG.INTEL.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d) with spool id 5539 for IETF-RUN@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 08:15:46 -0700
Received: from clio.sc.intel.com (scfdns01.sc.intel.com [143.183.152.25]) by mailbag.cps.INTEL.COM (8.9.3/8.9.3/d: relay.m4,v 1.6 2000/11/24 22:10:56 iwep Exp iwep $) with ESMTP id IAA12909 for <IETF-RUN@mailbag.cps.INTEL.COM>; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 08:15:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Ludwig.sc.intel.com (ludwig.sc.intel.com [143.183.53.32]) by clio.sc.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.36 2001/04/18 16:16:02 root Exp $) with SMTP id PAA29740 for <IETF-RUN@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM>; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 15:13:43 GMT
Received: by Ludwig.sc.intel.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA15973; Mon, 30 Apr 01 08:12:06 PDT
Message-ID: <10104301512.AA15973@Ludwig.sc.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 08:12:06 -0700
Reply-To: IETF-RUN <IETF-RUN@mailbag.cps.INTEL.COM>
Sender: IETF-RUN <IETF-RUN@mailbag.cps.INTEL.COM>
From: Sally Hambridge <sallyh@LUDWIG.SC.INTEL.COM>
Subject: Re: We've got lift-off
To: IETF-RUN@mailbag.cps.INTEL.COM

Walt - it's now RFC 3098
>
>
>Where is the authoritative version of draft-ietf-run-adverts-02.txt?  The document draft-ietf-run-adverts-02.txt is not on the ID
>list.
>
>Sally Hambridge wrote:
>
>> In case you didn't see this....
>>
>> Thanks very much to Ted and April for getting the DOC
>> to this stage.  We can now have recess.
>>
>> Sally
>> sallyh@ludwig.sc.intel.com
>>
>> >From ietf-123-owner@loki.ietf.org Fri Mar 16 09:30:18 2001
>> Received: from crotus.sc.intel.com (scfdns02.sc.intel.com) by Ludwig.sc.intel.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
>>         id AA19911; Fri, 16 Mar 01 09:30:17 PST
>> Received: from loki.ietf.org (loki.ietf.org [132.151.1.177])
>>         by crotus.sc.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.35 2001/02/12 09:03:45 smothers Exp $) with ESMTP id RAA01965
>>         for <sallyh@LUDWIG.SC.INTEL.COM>; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 17:33:44 GMT
>> Received: (from adm@localhost)
>>         by loki.ietf.org (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) id KAA07480
>>         for ietf-123-outbound.03@ietf.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 10:45:00 -0500 (EST)
>> Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [10.27.2.28])
>>         by loki.ietf.org (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA07464
>>         for <all-ietf@loki.ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 10:38:14 -0500 (EST)
>> Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US (localhost [127.0.0.1])
>>         by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA05265;
>>         Fri, 16 Mar 2001 10:38:14 -0500 (EST)
>> Message-Id: <200103161538.KAA05265@ietf.org>
>> To: IETF-Announce:;@loki.ietf.org
>> Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@isi.edu>, IANA <iana@iana.org>
>> Cc: Internet Architecture Board <iab@isi.edu>
>> Cc: ietf-run@mailbag.cps.intel.com
>> From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
>> Subject: Document Action: How to Advertise Responsibly Using the E-Mail
>>          and Newsgroups or- how NOT to $$$$$ MAKE ENEMIES FAST $$$$$ to
>>          Informational
>> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 10:38:14 -0500
>> Sender: scoya@cnri.reston.va.us
>> Status: R
>>
>> The IESG has approved the Internet-Draft 'How to Advertise Responsibly
>> Using the E-Mail and Newsgroups or- how NOT to $$$$$ MAKE ENEMIES FAST
>> $$$$$' <draft-ietf-run-adverts-02.txt> as a Informational.  This
>> document is the product of the Responsible Use of the Network Working
>> Group.  The IESG contact person is April Marine.
>>
>> Note to RFC Editor:
>>
>> The IESG respectfully requests the following be added prior to
>> publication as an RFC:
>>
>> Security Considerations
>>
>> This memo offers suggestions for responsible advertising techniques that
>> can be used via the Internet.  It does not raise or address security
>> issues, but special attention should be paid to the section on "Privacy."
>> While not strictly a network security consideration, privacy
>> considerations can have legal ramifications that deserve special
>> attention.
>
>--
>Walt Houser, VA Webmaster http://www.va.gov/
>VA Privacy Notice for Information Collected from E-mails and Web Forms http://www.va.gov/privacy/email.asp
>