Re: We've got lift-off

[Sally Hambridge <[e-mail]>]

>
>
Ted - check with April on the process for revisions - and if
you want to add the confirmed opt-in stuff I think it would
make the doc better, but I think it would have to go through
the entire approval loop again

As for spamcon, I can't think of anything special....

Sally
>
Ted said:
>Speaking of RFC-3098, how does everyone feel about making a quick
>amendment and resubmitting? We've gotten some good feedback and
>suggestions that would indicate that perhaps something is missing. In
>the discussion, we neglected to include a mail-loop approval, which
>essentially prevents the activity of an opt-in request until the
>requestor actually does something (click on a link, reply to the
>message, etc...). This shifts the responsibility from the user (having
>to deal with unauthorized subscriptions) to the list owners (having to
>verify each address prior to inclusion). It's a MAPS-endorsed
>protection, and I think it warrants inclusion in some text from the
>IETF.
>
>I'd be happy to make the changes and present it to the group and up
>the chain for resubmission, but I'd like to see what Sally, April and
>the group have to say about it.
>
>On another note, I've been asked to speak at SPAMCON regarding this
>subject and Responsible Use, from the business perspective as well as
>the policy perspective. Anyone have any points they'd like to see
>included?
>
>Ted
>
>